From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest) To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Subject: idealcopy-digest V10 #355 Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk idealcopy-digest Wednesday, April 9 2008 Volume 10 : Number 355 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [idealcopy] New Wire [Craig Grannell ] Re: [idealcopy] New Wire [Ari ] Re: [idealcopy] New Wire [Craig Grannell ] Re: [idealcopy] So... R'n'B 03? ["David McKenzie" ] Re: [idealcopy] So... R'n'B 03? ["David McKenzie" ] RE: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late ["Keith" ] Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire [giluz ] Re: [idealcopy] new live guitarist [giluz ] RE: [idealcopy] wire not wire ["Keith" ] [idealcopy] My Two Sense [TnA ] Re: [idealcopy] New Wire [Norm Fasey ] RE: [idealcopy] only ones on tv ["Keith" ] Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire [MarkBursa@aol.com] Re: [idealcopy] My Two Sense [Norm Fasey ] Re: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late [MarkBursa@aol.com] Re: [idealcopy] New Wire ["Paul Pietromonaco" ] Re: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late ["Paul Pietromonaco" ] Re: [idealcopy] New Wire [fernando ] Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire ["First Last" Subject: [idealcopy] New Wire "So how can they still call themselves Wire???" Because they're not being pretentious and dropping a letter this time. Or: how can REM still call themselves REM (etc.)? Note also on the website that Wir is not really considered anything separate from Wire any more. It's Wire, just without Rob. Plus, the core of Wire's writing was mostly Colin and Graham, and that's the writing partnership on Object 47. "does this mean that Bruce Gilbert did not play on Read & Burn 03?" Bruce quit the band in 2004. I can't remember whether there's any Bruce on R&B 03 (my memory seems to recall 'some dugga in one track, or something, if that), but he certainly wasn't directly involved - it's a Colin/Graham/Rob EP. Note with Margaret that she's not in the band per se - she didn't pay on Object 47, for example. She's been brought in to augment the live Wire. "Surely Malka was a front runner in the 'who'll replace Bruce race'" Malka plays bass. Also, those behind the various bands don't really want cross-pollination for various reasons. See also: Rob not drumming for Githead. "Is Robert Gotobed playing with Wire?" No, but Robert Grey is. By the way, everyone, all this talk about the live shows and who's in Wire is Wire-related activity like this list hasn't seen in ages, but there's also a new nine-track album due soon! Clearly, post-Bruce Wire still has plenty to offer. C ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:08:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Ari Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire >>Note with Margaret that she's not in the band per se - she didn't pay on Object 47, for example. She's been brought in to augment the live Wire.<< So it's 'just' Colin Graham and Robert? ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:21:20 +0100 From: Craig Grannell Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire > >>Note with Margaret that she's not in the band per se - she didn't > pay > on Object 47, for example. She's been brought in to augment the live > Wire.<< > So it's 'just' Colin Graham and Robert? Yes, Wire is currently a trio. Note the newer portraits at http://www.pinkflag.com/look.php C ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:17:22 -0500 From: "David McKenzie" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] So... R'n'B 03? That would be the last time there was a significant piece of news.Yesterday we got a twofer. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM, elektrolad wrote: > I was looking at my copy today and trying to figure it > out as well. > > wnd3 > > p.s. I can't remember the last time the list was so > active. > > > > --- Paul Pietromonaco wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > So - based on the two announcements about Object 47 > > and the tour lineup, > > does this mean that Bruce Gilbert did not play on > > Read & Burn 03? > > > > It doesn't explicitly say - but I think I can infer > > that the line-up for > > R'n'B 03 would be Colin Newman, Graham Lewis and > > Robert Grey. > > > > Does anyone actually know what the credits are? > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:18:12 -0500 From: "David McKenzie" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] So... R'n'B 03? now to trot over to the forums and see if they were kick-started On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, David McKenzie wrote: > That would be the last time there was a significant piece of news.Yesterday > we got a twofer. > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM, elektrolad wrote: > > > I was looking at my copy today and trying to figure it > > out as well. > > > > wnd3 > > > > p.s. I can't remember the last time the list was so > > active. > > > > > > > > --- Paul Pietromonaco wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > So - based on the two announcements about Object 47 > > > and the tour lineup, > > > does this mean that Bruce Gilbert did not play on > > > Read & Burn 03? > > > > > > It doesn't explicitly say - but I think I can infer > > > that the line-up for > > > R'n'B 03 would be Colin Newman, Graham Lewis and > > > Robert Grey. > > > > > > Does anyone actually know what the credits are? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference > > > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:58:25 +0100 From: "Keith" Subject: RE: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late >try tinyurl.com mr. K.......... OK. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GIBSON-LES-PAUL-Owned-by-Vini-Reilly-FACTORY-RECORDS_W 0QQitemZ320228495526QQihZ011QQcategoryZ33040QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie wItem ; ) - ----- Original Message ---- From: Keith To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2008 9:19:09 PM Subject: [idealcopy] Too Late But may be of interest to Durutti fans. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GIBSON-LES-PAUL-Owned-by-Vini-Reilly-FACTORY-RECORDS_W 0QQitemZ320228495526QQihZ011QQcategoryZ33040QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie wItem ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:08:28 +0100 From: "Keith" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] new live guitarist I don't think any of the LA Doors are from America, are they? Though they could be French and actually be La Doors. Or Scousers... ; ) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of Tim Sent: 08 April 2008 03:04 To: Ideal Copy Subject: Re: [idealcopy] new live guitarist Well that woke you bastards up didn't it?! Did you know, that only one member of the Australian Pink Floyd is actually Australian? http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/entertainment/music/live_reviews/s/10 44213_australian_pink_floyd__apollo Welcome aboard Margaret! What I wanna know is: Is Robert Gotobed playing with Wire? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:23:50 +0100 From: "Keith" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] New Wire - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of Craig Grannell Sent: 08 April 2008 11:21 To: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire > >>Note with Margaret that she's not in the band per se - she didn't > pay > on Object 47, for example. She's been brought in to augment the live > Wire.<< So it's 'just' Colin Graham and Robert? Yes, Wire is currently a trio. Note the newer portraits at http://www.pinkflag.com/look.php C Scroll right down ro the bottom of the page, next to thend, photo 17 of 18, and there's a unique photo of the new four piece line-up. Gotta say that Margaret's not what I expected... ; ) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:39:04 +0300 From: giluz Subject: Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire I am less interested in what Wire should be or do, and more in the end product itself. It's just a shame, especially since Bruce was quite dominant in R&B 1&2. I do expect the new line-up to be no less than brilliant live and in the studio (or maybe the studio work will be done as a trio, I don't know). I don't mind whether it'll be called wir, were, wie, wiz, wooz or bits of wire, string, rope, thread, etc., and who plays what, as long as it's good. giluz On 08/04/2008, Keith wrote: > Wire have had a far more stable line-up that Status Quo, Tim. > > Yours pedantically, > > > Keith > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf > Of Tim > Sent: 08 April 2008 03:41 > To: idealcopy@smoe.org > Subject: Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire > > > elektrolad wrote: > > So how can they still call themselves Wire??? > > > > > > > That kind of comment has resonated throughout pop history. > > So how can they still call themselves The Fall? > So how can they still call themselves Fleetwood Mac? > So how can they still call themselves Genesis? > So how can they still call themselves Boney M? > > > Wire has always been bigger than the four founder members, hence they > have always referred to 'it'. It is what it is. Wir was envisaged as > something very apart from Wire (although it actually sounded a lot more > like Wire than Manscape!) > > I've got tickets to See Wire and My Bloody Valentine this year. I can't > wait! I've no idea what on earth these gigs will consist of, who will be > on stage and what will be played! Personally what I don't look for in > bands is predicatability and a stable line-up...I guess you'd be better > off following Status Quo or U2. > - -- Now playing: http://www.last.fm/user/giluz/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:42:08 +0300 From: giluz Subject: Re: [idealcopy] new live guitarist On 07/04/2008, elektrolad wrote: > A *girl* in Wire!!! Oh, the horror! Is she gonna be their Brix? - -- Now playing: http://www.last.fm/user/giluz/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:38:57 +0100 From: "Keith" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] wire not wire >Female guitarist in the Gilbert hotseat? Ah, the unexpected. How very Wire. Mark Dunno about that. Surely Malka was a front runner in the 'who'll replace Bruce race'? Anyway, what's done is done. Like Chris said...Welcome Margaret! Incidentally, just read this on another list, but dunno where they got it from. "LATEST! Pre-Concert Talk with Wire at Contact Theatre, Oxford Road. 6pm - 7pm. Free ticket available in advance, in person, on production of your Wire concert ticket only on first-come first served basis." ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:52:18 -0400 From: TnA Subject: [idealcopy] My Two Sense 1. Glad to be surprised by Wire, its one of the things I most enjoy about art. Most of my favorite bands had(ve) mixed genders; the list is far too long to include (or even remember), but let's say from VU to MARS to the EX, for starters. 2. Laika were great, saw them several times in the 'dub conscious' 90's in Chicago (seem to recall Moonshake as well), although the tempo seemed about 1/4 of Wire's recent efforts. As Wire performed a thermonuclear exorcism in 2000(?), I'm sure they'll include Atlanta again to survey the damage. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:41:22 +0100 From: Norm Fasey Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire Better photo here... http://idolator.com/376938/things-that-look-100-awesome-part-ii More info here.. http://www.magsmcginnis.com/press.html Norm Keith wrote: -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [ mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org ] On Behalf Of Craig Grannell Sent: 08 April 2008 11:21 To: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire Note with Margaret that she's not in the band per se - she didn't pay on Object 47, for example. She's been brought in to augment the live Wire.<< So it's 'just' Colin Graham and Robert? Yes, Wire is currently a trio. Note the newer portraits at http://www.pinkflag.com/look.php C Scroll right down ro the bottom of the page, next to thend, photo 17 of 18, and there's a unique photo of the new four piece line-up. Gotta say that Margaret's not what I expected... ; ) - -- ICQ: 126113095 Yahoo Instant Messager: nfasey Inbox protected by ClearMyMailwww.ClearMyMail.com {cda219d4ef9e484c9473cc10b8b6c80d} [demime 0.97c-p1 removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of norm.vcf] ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:44:13 +0100 From: "Keith" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] only ones on tv this from John Perry myspace page prior to the show... > > JOOLS HOLLAND SHOW > > OK, the latest news is that we play LIVE TO AIR on > April 1st. > > BUT -- Tune in again to Jools on April 4th and we'll > be playing the same songs, but they're DIFFERENT > TAKES. > > Don't ask me! It's a new series & they're > experimenting with new formats. > > Had a few emails from people saying "OH NO we missed > Koko (Coco??) we didn't know there was a gig" -- so > if you feel inclined, pass on the news about this > new format 'LATER WITH JOOLS' to your 12 best > friends. > > (Maybe thats a bad idea? If you ask anybody to 'KEEP > THIS TO YOURSELF' you can be certain they'll tell > their girlfriend, boyfriend, uncle, auntie, > chauffeur, dogwalker, postman and their 12 best > friends, immediately ... so perhaps the message > should be 'KEEP THIS TO YOURSELF' ?? > > I leave it to your judgment. > > > In reply to: Re: The Only Ones (elegant chaos) Reply | with quote - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of MarkBursa@aol.com Sent: 05 April 2008 15:28 To: paulrabjohn@btinternet.com; keith.indoorminer@virgin.net Cc: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: Re: [idealcopy] only ones on tv Did you notice the fact that the Friday AGAP was a different take to the Tuesday one? I guess they recorded Later as normal on Tuesday afternoon/evening, then did the live run-through at the end, rather than trying to edit together the shopw from the live edition and the outtakes. Gives them a chance to sort out the mix too. Shame the Only Ones didn't take the opportunity to play a different song. I guess they have to play AGAP so perople know who they are! M ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:53:37 EDT From: MarkBursa@aol.com Subject: Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire >>Wire have had a far more stable line-up that Status Quo, Tim. Yours pedantically,<< Ah, you beat me to the punch there! Once saw a poster for (in huge type) STATUS QUO playing the ever-splendid Stourbridge Rock Cafe 2000. Thinking this was a bit below them, even allowing for a slide in fortunes of recent times, I looked closer. Above (in huge type) STATUS QUO was (in minuscule type) John Coghlan's Yep, the drummer's "version". I like it I like it Iike it etc M ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:34:58 +0100 From: Norm Fasey Subject: Re: [idealcopy] My Two Sense Mags McGinnis comes with a good pedigree and should be given a chance. She can only add to the unique sound of Wire. From what I can remember from seeing Wire in 2002 in Brighton and 2003 in San Francisco, Bruce did look like he wasn't really into it and maybe was struggling a bit. The guy is 62 now. Maybe he has arthritis in the hands or something? He did seem to be playing his guitar tuned to a open E chord and barring up and down the neck. He was well down in the mix for most of the gig. Just adding some 'dugga dugga'. Lets not forget how grateful we were to have GitHead to listen to in between the bursts of Wire creativity. Now at least we have 75% of Wire on tour. I for one am looking forward to it. Especially if they add some more UK dates. Norm TnA wrote: > 1. Glad to be surprised by Wire, its one of the things I most enjoy > about art. Most of my favorite bands had(ve) mixed genders; the list is > far too long to include (or even remember), but let's say from VU > to MARS to the EX, for starters. > 2. Laika were great, saw them several times in the 'dub conscious' > 90's in Chicago (seem to recall Moonshake as well), although the tempo > seemed about 1/4 of Wire's recent efforts. As Wire performed a > thermonuclear exorcism in 2000(?), I'm sure they'll include Atlanta > again to > survey the damage. > - -- ICQ: 126113095 Yahoo Instant Messager: nfasey Inbox protected by ClearMyMail www.ClearMyMail.com {cda219d4ef9e484c9473cc10b8b6c80d} [demime 0.97c-p1 removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of norm.vcf] ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:43:36 EDT From: MarkBursa@aol.com Subject: Re: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late My oh my, Vini and Peter Perrett. Separated at near-death. Mark ;-) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:17:04 -0700 From: "Paul Pietromonaco" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire > By the way, everyone, all this talk about the live shows and who's in > Wire is Wire-related activity like this list hasn't seen in ages, but > there's also a new nine-track album due soon! Clearly, post-Bruce Wire > still has plenty to offer. > Oh - there's *no* debate about that. I'm excited about the new album, and the upcoming live dates. I think that the questions about Bruce have more to deal with the "performance art" aspects of Wire. By this, I mean the idea of Wire as an art project and the Dadaist tendencies inside the band. To clarify, I know that it was announced that Bruce left in 2004. But - in the back of my mind - I still can't help thinking "What if he didn't? What if Bruce and the band have started an elaborate art project that gave the appearance of him leaving the band? Perhaps even now, they're going to introduce a new member - Gruce Bilbert - who performs covered in white chiffon..." I'm not trying to be humorous here - you never *quite* know with Wire. Especially with the, up to now, contradictory messages from Wire's management and the website. I re-read their interview in Mojo a little while back - and even though Bruce was adamant he had left, Colin wasn't. So - I think we're just establishing the facts here - and looking forward to the next phase, etc. My 2 cents, anyway. ^_^ Cheers, Paul ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:27:40 -0700 From: "Paul Pietromonaco" Subject: Re: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late Here you go: http://tinyurl.com/2wux2t Cheers, Paul - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith" To: "'Ari'" ; Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:58 AM Subject: RE: [SPAM]: Re: [idealcopy] Too Late > >try tinyurl.com mr. K.......... > > OK. > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GIBSON-LES-PAUL-Owned-by-Vini-Reilly-FACTORY-RECORDS_W > 0QQitemZ320228495526QQihZ011QQcategoryZ33040QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie > wItem > > > ; ) > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Keith > To: idealcopy@smoe.org > Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2008 9:19:09 PM > Subject: [idealcopy] Too Late > > But may be of interest to Durutti fans. > > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GIBSON-LES-PAUL-Owned-by-Vini-Reilly-FACTORY-RECORDS_W > 0QQitemZ320228495526QQihZ011QQcategoryZ33040QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie > wItem > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > ________ > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster > Total Access, No Cost. > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 00:16:37 +0100 From: "Keith Knight" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] only ones on tv Caught up with Later last night (but then got distracted by some news about something or other). The Only Ones' perfoprmance was, frankly, pants - they seemed more like a tribute band fronted by someone who had gone to hell and back half a dozen times. And that weird voice...! But the new song IS immediately recognisable so perhaps the new album will be worth a listen. I was a big fan back in the day. Just back from Holy Fuck who were a little disappointing - the hoped-for Motorik groove never really got going. The songs really are far too short - young whippersnappers have no patience these days. They came across more like Battles than Neu! Am now reliant on the first UK performance of Harmonia in a couple of weeks - now that should deliver what I want. Ein anderes Keith - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of PAUL RABJOHN Sent: 05 April 2008 14:16 To: Keith Cc: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: Re: [idealcopy] only ones on tv hmmm , you are dead right keith that AGAP was a bit dodgy , horrible tinny sound and the band seemed a bit intimidated by the format. shame. however , i thought the Guardian's music critics description of PP looking like a "masturbating Orville" was a little harsh (er , and how would she know?) (not to our non-UK based friends , Orville was an oversized green duck who formed part (the better part) of a ventriloquist act on duff 80's TV. not sighted in ages i'd thought , until.......) well i was sitting with the kids this morning watching a show called "The Slammer" (concept ; talent show in a prison , winner gets to go free) and who should appear but the aforementioned Orville (with his mate Keith Harris , natch). in a highly surreal moment , the track used for his grand entrance was "Wake Up" by Rage Against the Machine , which segued beautifully into a rendition of Orville's 80's hit "I Wish I Could Fly". (This really did happen , honest). Sadly Orville only came 2nd to a 9-year old Bollywood dancer (it wasn't explained why she was in prison. I guess for Keith and Orv it was more obvious). But he did beat Mr Methane and his Flatulent Frolics ( kids TV has moved a long way since Camberwick Green it would appear). the Only Ones never did any new stuff at the gig i saw last year. and Pete never looked like a duck either. p - ----- Original Message - ---- From: Keith To: PAUL RABJOHN ; idealcopy@smoe.org Sent: Saturday, 5 April, 2008 12:42:59 PM Subject: RE: [idealcopy] only ones on tv Thought the version of AGAP was a bit ropey on Tues, particularly the backing vocs (and it seemed a bit sluggish at times). Still, it was good to see them on the telly, even if PP's voice has gone against nature and convention and got higher and not lower! Thought they were better last night, and the new song sounded promising. Very Only Ones! Certainly preferred it to the one newie they played at that fab Manchester last year - Learning To Fly or something. That sounded a bit half-baked to me, though they've probably polished it a bit by now. There's a quick interview here... http://www.bbc.co.uk/later/shows/series32/episode01/onlyones/ As for Leuven... Can't help on location, etc, but I am going - via Eurostar. Can't wait! Keith Np TARWATER - Rabbit Moon Revisited - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of PAUL RABJOHN Sent: 01 April 2008 21:05 To: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: [idealcopy] only ones on tv just to say the only ones are on jools holland later this friday. i don't think they are on the short live version tonight , i thnk the more obscure acts just get shown on the re-run on friday. i was out at a gig on saturday (vic godard) talking to a couple of guys i'd not met before. turned out almost everyone there had seen the only ones in wolverhampton last year and been blown away by it. amazing gig , you just wouldn't have dared to imagine they could be that good. the big "epic" album tracks were the real killers , i suspect you don't need to be mystic meg to guess one of the tracks they'll be playing friday ;-) i have a possibility to get to the leuven gig. can anyone tell me how big this venue is and how easy to find? p ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:26:01 +0100 (BST) From: elektrolad Subject: RE: [idealcopy] New Wire > Scroll right down ro the bottom of the page, next to > thend, photo 17 of 18, > and there's a unique photo of the new four piece > line-up. > > Gotta say that Margaret's not what I expected... > > ; ) > Looks like a man baby! And a dwarf as well. wnd3 ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:47:48 -0700 From: fernando Subject: Re: [idealcopy] New Wire Nice comment to emphasize on negative physical attributes when the sole context is that of music here... but may be I am wrong: being a man-baby and a dwarf can influence her playing on stage and/or contributions to the group. On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:26 PM, elektrolad wrote: >> Scroll right down ro the bottom of the page, next to >> thend, photo 17 of 18, >> and there's a unique photo of the new four piece >> line-up. >> >> Gotta say that Margaret's not what I expected... >> >> ; ) >> > > > Looks like a man baby! And a dwarf as well. > > wnd3 > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:12:56 +0800 From: "First Last" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] wire not wire Shame there wasn't one almighty bust up! ;) We then could have x2 versions of Wire, Wir,Ire,Wre? - One with BC & one with CN & GL in a Brian Connolly & Mick Tucker Sweet band split scenario? They could alternate headlining between gigs (Having had a showbiz style reunion) Or, alternatively, x3 versions with one original member in each....;) Back to coat getting & lurking.... Tim B. NP Current 93 - When you hear the singing, you will know it is time On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:53 PM, wrote: > >>Wire have had a far more stable line-up that Status Quo, Tim. > > Yours pedantically,<< > > > > Ah, you beat me to the punch there! > > Once saw a poster for (in huge type) STATUS QUO playing the ever-splendid > Stourbridge Rock Cafe 2000. Thinking this was a bit below them, even allowing > for a slide in fortunes of recent times, I looked closer. > > Above (in huge type) STATUS QUO was (in minuscule type) John Coghlan's > > Yep, the drummer's "version". > > I like it I like it Iike it etc > > M ------------------------------ End of idealcopy-digest V10 #355 ********************************