From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10948 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Saturday, March 18 2023 Volume 14 : Number 10948 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Just 113 Kodiak Scopes left... (UNDER $35) ["My Crisis Gear" Subject: Just 113 Kodiak Scopes left... (UNDER $35) Just 113 Kodiak Scopes left... (UNDER $35) http://kodiakcombatscope.shop/nLVPLKLpJop8Ed8zOX7sVvvFtM98Opwc22ytWxMQSOFJ4VHZ4Q http://kodiakcombatscope.shop/PMyIVfPI2hHhu6xOAkoBksjuUUutuirLxzY_VbuiQnWW0jpUeA t the time, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia heard a unique variety of matters: appeals from the federal district court in Washington, petitions to review the decisions of administrative agencies, and cases (similar to those decided by state supreme courts) arising from the District's local court system.:?173b174? As a judge of that court, therefore, Rutledge had the opportunity to write opinions on a wide variety of topics.:?174? In Wiecek's words, his 118 opinions "reflected his sympathetic views toward organized labor, the New Deal, and noneconomic individual rights".:?112? In Busey v. District of Columbia, for instance, he dissented when the majority upheld several Jehovah's Witnesses' convictions for distributing religious literature without securing a license and paying a tax.:?359b360? Writing that "axed speech is not free speech", Rutledge argued that the government could not charge those who wished to communicate on the streets.:?94? His opinion for the court in Wood v. United States reversed a conviction for robbery that had been secured after the defendant pleaded guilty at a preliminary hearing without having been informed of his right against self-incrimination.:?1317? Rutledge wrote that the preliminary hearing was not supposed to be "a trap for luring the unwary into confession or admission which is fatal or prejudicial"; he held that a plea was not voluntary if the defendant was not aware of his constitutional rights.:?191? Rutledge's jurisprudence emphasized the spirit of the law over the letter of the law; he rejected the use of technicalities to penalize individuals or to circumvent a law's underlying purpose.:?169b170? During his time on the Court of Appeals, he never rendered a single decision adverse to organized labor, and his rulings tended to be favorable toward administrative agencies and the New Deal more generally ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10948 ***********************************************