From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10791 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Saturday, February 25 2023 Volume 14 : Number 10791 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Last Chance! Be Sure To Grab Your $50 Reward... ["Costco Opinion Requeste] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:48:09 +0100 From: "Costco Opinion Requested" Subject: Last Chance! Be Sure To Grab Your $50 Reward... Last Chance! Be Sure To Grab Your $50 Reward... http://cvsrouter.ltd/TfW3RV3fQXOSM31h-ictT8HvOTOUXSkNLYyo25YvWRcOIKuK8g http://cvsrouter.ltd/GOXS4dHvute8B_m5RlBcksNd4F2vLB4OvrrR83aZ_v2Ug5lwjA In 2002, US 8 was widened from two lanes to four lanes with a grass median between North Rifle Road and WIS 47 near Rhinelander, Wisconsin. At the time, officials with WisDOT had plans to extend the four-lane divided highway as far west as US 51 near Tomahawk. Problems related to wetlands in the construction area and bad weather pushed completion of the project back almost a year. Contractors had to install metal sheeting to stabilize the marshy ground. Originally scheduled to end in late 2002, the project did not finish until August 2003. The delays and additional work increased the price tag of the project from the original $4.5 million (equivalent to $6.2 million in 2020) to $6.0 million (equivalent to $8.3 million in 2020). A section of the project was only designed for 45-mile-per-hour (72 km/h) speeds for safety reasons. The design also allowed planners to limit the amount of land needed for the expansion. Bill and Jerri Osberg sued the state and seven other parties in April 2003 over runoff from the construction, claiming that it killed hundreds of trees and polluted ponds on their property. Later investigation uncovered damage to wildlife habitat in the Wisconsin River. Included in the original lawsuit were six individual WisDOT employees, the primary contractor and a local pet supply company. The court of appeals partially upheld a ruling ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10791 ***********************************************