From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10640 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, February 1 2023 Volume 14 : Number 10640 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Welcome to Milwaukee Power Drill Reward Panel ["Lowe's Unlocked" Subject: Welcome to Milwaukee Power Drill Reward Panel Welcome to Milwaukee Power Drill Reward Panel http://myshedplan.best/6fN3f6JC8gsl8lAbKM0x0z1FfAz1RpM84NDKjt-G2j_yl482Pg http://myshedplan.best/aqrDS2C-3-meb_XNN9ehaiX3pqNyEv5je-RURBn9TTmXznk6xQ he orbiter was protected from heat during reentry by the thermal protection system (TPS), a thermal soaking protective layer around the orbiter. In contrast with previous US spacecraft, which had used ablative heat shields, the reusability of the orbiter required a multi-use heat shield.:?72b73? During reentry, the TPS experienced temperatures up to 1,600 B0C (3,000 B0F), but had to keep the orbiter vehicle's aluminum skin temperature below 180 B0C (350 B0F). The TPS primarily consisted of four types of tiles. The nose cone and leading edges of the wings experienced temperatures above 1,300 B0C (2,300 B0F), and were protected by reinforced carbon-carbon tiles (RCC). Thicker RCC tiles were developed and installed in 1998 to prevent damage from micrometeoroid and orbital debris.:?II-112b113? The entire underside of the orbiter vehicle, as well as the other hottest surfaces, were protected with high-temperature reusable surface insulation. Areas on the upper parts of the orbiter vehicle were coated in a white low-temperature reusable surface insulation, which provided protection at temperatures below 650 B0C (1,200 B0F). The payload bay doors and parts of the upper wing surfaces were coated in reusable felt surface insulation, as the temperature there remained below 370 B0C (700 B0F).:?395? Two solid rocket boosters (SRBs) were connected to the ET, and burned for the first two minutes of flight.:?II-222? The SRBs separated from the ET once they had expended their fuel and fell into the Atlantic Ocean under a parachute.:?II-289? NASA retrieval teams recovered the SRBs and returned them to the Kennedy Space Center, where t ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:48:27 +0100 From: "W A R N I N G" Subject: Hereās the TRUTH about heart disease Herebs the TRUTH about heart disease http://brainsavior.best/XMpfBIYMuVIxnkfxwF8BimS2ATwoLHtoM8XTqPijubeNFoqD2Q http://brainsavior.best/MjnPLC6AtXFjw_zNGQmbyzlwsBmVHkBvVfHp7yxprNe21flnrw hat the orbiter experienced. The first bipod ramp foam strike occurred during STS-7; the orbiter's TPS was repaired after the mission but no changes were made to address the cause of the bipod foam loss.:?123? After bipod foam loss on STS-32, NASA engineers, under the assumption that the foam loss was due to pressure buildup within the insulation, added vent holes to the foam to allow gas to escape. After a bipod foam strike damaged the TPS on STS-50, internal NASA investigations concluded it was an "accepted flight risk" and that it should not be treated as a flight safety issue. Bipod foam loss occurred on STS-52 and STS-62, but neither event was noticed until the investigation following Columbia's destruction.:?124? During STS-112, which flew in October 2002, a 4-by-5-by-12-inch (10 by 13 by 30 cm) chunk of bipod ramp foam broke away from the ET bipod ramp and hit the SRB-ET attachment ring near the bottom of the left SRB, creating a dent 4 inches (10 cm) wide and 3 inches (8 cm) deep.:?124? Following the mission, the Program Requirements Control Board declined to categorize the bipod ramp foam loss as an in-flight anomaly. The foam loss was briefed at the STS-113 Flight Readiness Brief, but the Program Requirements Control Board decided that the ET was safe to fly.:?125? A debris strike from the ablative material on the right SRB caused significant damage to Atlantis during the STS-27 launch on December 2, 1988. On the second day of the flight the crew inspected the damage using a camera on the remote manipulator system. The debris strike removed a tile; the exposed orbiter skin was a reinforced section, and a burn-through mig ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10640 ***********************************************