From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10435 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Monday, January 2 2023 Volume 14 : Number 10435 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Here are the answers to your questions ["Today's Horoscope" Subject: Here are the answers to your questions Here are the answers to your questions http://copperdefense.shop/BLaIkvuYjOB-J3sdFQX3SvXDgGGMCaCf3td0zoMMQcZxYqQ6wQ http://copperdefense.shop/D8jtw2ZMHYTTTmroLNrRvedQ57DI_c1AlXcsAM6zcU3NfF2bsQ ainor delivers her soprano vocals with a twang on "Like I'm Gonna Lose You", which is a soul ballad. Unlike other songs on Title, it features minimal instrumental accompaniment and places emphasis on Trainor's vocals; the Associated Press's Melanie J. Sims noted that in a rare moment for Trainor, it does not employ "a catchy hook or quirky production". Ian Gittins of Virgin Media described "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" as a "classic Motown-style ballad", and Chuck Arnold of Rolling Stone likened Trainor and Legend's chemistry on the "finger-snapping ballad" to that between Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell. "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" is a love song with lyrics about fatalism. Trainor stated she wrote it after having one of "those nightmares that your brother or sister or boyfriend just dies", after which, one is relieved to find them still alive: "It's like I'm going to love you like I'm going to lose you because I know what it feels like from that dream and I'm not going to let it happen". In the lyrics of "Like I'm Gonna Lose You", she parlays her fear of losing a loved one into determination to relish and savor every moment spent with them. Trainor sings about how "tomorro ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 02:10:44 -0500 From: "Haarko Santoku Knives" Subject: Beautiful and unique haarko santoku knives are essential for every chief Beautiful and unique haarko santoku knives are essential for every chief http://ups-survey.rest/mRY-4ZwPLTh_n7etOXvtbRxD_FlLPKPgRYJUgPIEWe9XaCrepg http://ups-survey.rest/bgjftqqDtT3L2TyUJBE_CG8d6StkI6Y-_G46MT7HGzPM8F38MQ oject was only designed for 45-mile-per-hour (72 km/h) speeds for safety reasons. The design also allowed planners to limit the amount of land needed for the expansion. Bill and Jerri Osberg sued the state and seven other parties in April 2003 over runoff from the construction, claiming that it killed hundreds of trees and polluted ponds on their property. Later investigation uncovered damage to wildlife habitat in the Wisconsin River. Included in the original lawsuit were six individual WisDOT employees, the primary contractor and a local pet supply company. The court of appeals partially upheld a ruling by the district court dismissing the employees and the contractor from the lawsuit in March 2006. The pet supply company was reinstated in the case by the appeals court. The couple settled their claims, and the state pursued the matter against Pagel Construction in a related lawsuit. WisDOT alleged that the contractor did not follow proper erosion controls and failed to remediate the erosion damage to the Osbergs' property. The state wanted the construction company to forfeit their $70,000 retainer (equivalent to $96,000 in 2020) and pay damages of $150,000 (equivalent to $184,000 in 2020). Pagel Construction faulted WisDOT's erosion control plan and said that the state's engineers controlled the project and w ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10435 ***********************************************