From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10320 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Tuesday, December 13 2022 Volume 14 : Number 10320 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Every woman's fantasy ["Erectile Dysfunction" Subject: Every woman's fantasy Every woman's fantasy http://vertigodizziness.shop/EhmdAyhd4SuvD_GR2q_f7FtygCDiNIQzEtlbOckoBfyf8LSmfA http://vertigodizziness.shop/ggB09y1Dxk0jiheGPljvJoN2pgi5LOm5DaXjWttsld5KJC9csw rts on casemate ironclads as a means to harass the Union blockade of their ports, but this was a choice dictated by available technology and materials rather than by confidence in the possibilities of this type. Since breaking the Union blockade was the primary objective of the Confederacy's casemate ironclads, as outlined in a May 1861 letter from its Secretary of the Navy Stephen Mallory (who was the one who came up with the idea of employing ironclads to offset the numerical superiority of the Union Navy in the first place) to the Confederate House Committee on Naval Affairs, the majority of them were from the outset designed to operate in coastal waters as well as inland waters, and unlike their Union counterparts were, theoretically at least, seaworthy to a limited extent b since they were never expected to venture out onto the high seas. This was exemplified by the fact that most Confederate ironclads were designed with a keeled deep draft hull, as opposed to the Union shallow draft flat bottom hulls (also featured on the Confederate river ironclads of which there were also a number built). This came at a cost however, Confederate coastal ironclads frequently ran aground when operating in inland waters or shallow coastal waters, wit ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10320 ***********************************************