From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V4 #485 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, December 20 2000 Volume 04 : Number 485 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: discuss we shall! [Lori Martin ] Re: discuss we shall! [Lori Martin ] Re: discuss we shall! [SugarFly26@aol.com] Re: discuss we shall! [chad schrock ] Re: discuss we shall! [chad schrock ] Re: discuss we shall! [Lori Martin ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:46:40 -0500 From: Lori Martin Subject: Re: discuss we shall! that little hussy chad schrock wrote: > Oh Richard, you're just jealous because I'm having Jian's > love child. As if you're the first groupie who ever got knocked up by a Rock Star. Sheesh. Next thing you know, we'll be hearing tiresome details about love-child support. It really would be too bad if AJ had to get a second job just to support your indiscretion with the great love of his life. So when's the blessed event due to occur, anyway? :) - -- Lori Glitter Fairy/Tattooing Fru/High Priestess, Murray's Sect ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:09:49 -0500 From: Lori Martin Subject: Re: discuss we shall! SugarFly26@aol.com wrote: > Someone who types a hell of a lot like my friend said: oh my. Does that mean I have the prerequisites to be your friend too? > (Unless you think there really is an elitist clique, in which case it's > dead-on truth I suppose.)>> > Or unless you start your own elitist cliques. Come join my clique! I can just > see mine now... So if I have those prerequisites, I guess I can be in? Ooooo. - -- Lori Glitter Fairy/Tattooing Fru/High Priestess, Murray's Sect ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:48:06 EST From: SugarFly26@aol.com Subject: Re: discuss we shall! after reading my post, Lori wondered: <<> (Unless you think there really is an elitist clique, in which case it's > dead-on truth I suppose.)>> > Or unless you start your own elitist cliques. Come join my clique! I can just > see mine now... So if I have those prerequisites, I guess I can be in? Ooooo. >> You can definitely be in my clique. We even have a secret handshake. So secret that I don't even know it. My superiors (the REAL clique leaders) haven't told me yet. - -------> Ln ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:27:57 -0500 From: chad schrock Subject: Re: discuss we shall! Lori Martin wrote: > that little hussy chad schrock wrote: you wanna start somethin' here? > > Oh Richard, you're just jealous because I'm having Jian's > > love child. > As if you're the first groupie who ever got knocked up by > a Rock Star. Sheesh. I think I'm safe in claiming a couple of firsts here. > Next thing you know, we'll be hearing tiresome details about > love-child support. I could just post an endless series of pictures. > It really would be too bad if AJ had to get a second job just > to support your indiscretion with the great love of his life. Well, I'm not going to raise my child on a muscians salary! > So when's the blessed event due to occur, anyway? :) One of these days. - -- chad at radix dot net - helvetica ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:55:53 -0500 From: chad schrock Subject: Re: discuss we shall! Lori Martin wrote: > chad schrock challenged (go ahead, say THAT three times fast): > > > you wanna start somethin' here? > don't I always? good point. > > > As if you're the first groupie who ever got knocked up by > > > a Rock Star. Sheesh. > > I think I'm safe in claiming a couple of firsts here. > uh, yeah. I've always been slightly ahead of my time. > > > Next thing you know, we'll be hearing tiresome details about > > > love-child support. > > I could just post an endless series of pictures. > Not on This Newsgroup you don't! This is not a binaries > newsgroup! :P I'll be sure to save the large ones to mail directly to you. :P (touchi) > > > It really would be too bad if AJ had to get a second job just > > > to support your indiscretion with the great love of his life. > > Well, I'm not going to raise my child on a muscians salary! > Good point. > AJ, love, it's time to update that resume I fear. And try for a good job this time, huh? - -- chad at radix dot net - helvetica ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:46:00 -0500 From: Lori Martin Subject: Re: discuss we shall! chad schrock challenged (go ahead, say THAT three times fast): > you wanna start somethin' here? don't I always? > > As if you're the first groupie who ever got knocked up by > > a Rock Star. Sheesh. > I think I'm safe in claiming a couple of firsts here. uh, yeah. > > Next thing you know, we'll be hearing tiresome details about > > love-child support. > I could just post an endless series of pictures. Not on This Newsgroup you don't! This is not a binaries newsgroup! :P > > It really would be too bad if AJ had to get a second job just > > to support your indiscretion with the great love of his life. > Well, I'm not going to raise my child on a muscians salary! Good point. AJ, love, it's time to update that resume I fear. - -- Lori Glitter Fairy/Tattooing Fru/High Priestess, Murray's Sect ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V4 #485 ********************************************