From: owner-alloy-digest@smoe.org (alloy-digest) To: alloy-digest@smoe.org Subject: alloy-digest V5 #293 Reply-To: alloy@smoe.org Sender: owner-alloy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-alloy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "alloy-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. alloy-digest Tuesday, December 5 2000 Volume 05 : Number 293 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Alloy: RE: Atari ST's remembered fondly ... [Damien Sweeney ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:06:25 -0600 From: Damien Sweeney Subject: Alloy: RE: Atari ST's remembered fondly ... >Believe it or not I use an ATARI 1040STFM for my MIDI sequencing. >It works and I know the Pro24 III software very well - so apart >from the Plus Audio aspects of CUBASE - which is a big plus - >I agree - I'm ok on the sequencer side. Tim, I believe it. Glad to know that Atari's are still being used! I'm still a huge fan and my partner still has his. I started with a 520ST then on to a 1040 and then finally a Mega 2. I used to run the Hybrid Arts SMPTE track sequencer with a lot of Dr T's stuff back in the 80's. Recently I switched to IBM with Cakewalk Pro (just not the same) and the Midiman Delta 1010 digital recorder card/box. I'm using a Roland XP-80 and an Ensoniq VFX (I still just love the sound of it). The IBM/Cakewalk setup works great but I find myself wanting the familiar (and STABLE!) Atari back over and over. I hate to think of it as an old dog/new trick kind of thing but I think that's what it is. Ok - just had to geek out for a few minutes - I now return you to your regularly scheduled Alloy... Damien - Sinking like a bug in a peach... Damien J. Sweeney dsweeney@netpros-inc.net President/CEO Network Professionals, Inc. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 22:55:58 +0000 From: Slarvibarglhee Subject: Re: Alloy: Apologies Beth Meyer wrote: > Hi, Elaine; > > > If you're not familiar with > SIGCHI, it is *huge*, and one of the main professional organizations for > people who focus on making computer applications easy for real human beings to > use. As opposed to .......... ? Sorry, couldn't resist that. Slarv ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:26:51 -0700 From: "Keith Stansell" Subject: Re: Alloy: Apologies - ----- Original Message ----- > Beth Meyer wrote: > > > Hi, Elaine; > > > > > > > If you're not familiar with > > SIGCHI, it is *huge*, and one of the main professional organizations for > > people who focus on making computer applications easy for real human beings to > > use. > >Slarv Added.. > As opposed to .......... ? Software developers - were not human, we are super-human! Oh wait, perhaps that is sub-human. I always get those confused. - -Keith (who has been staring at Cold Fusion code too long today) Stansell ------------------------------ End of alloy-digest V5 #293 ***************************