I'm in...
   
  bob
  

Michael Coxe <audities@gmail.com> wrote:
  Hersh Forman wrote:
> ...what's the point in forming a new list? It becomes mainly a
> "rebranding" exercise. Why not just continue Audities as it is?
> Despite the recent fooferah, Audities in my experience is a
> very well behaved list with generally civil discord.

Stewart Mason replied:
> Because Michael wants to wash his hands of list-mod duties,
> which is fair enough.

Hersh Forman counterpointed:
> Michael, do you still wish to give up management of Audities?

Absolutely. And have the name changed, for reasons that have
been discussed here a number of times. The new name PLUS active,
involved administrators AND an understood, followed and enforced
list Etiquette policy could do wonders.

I am disappointed we've lost the cutover momentum. Wasn't there
going to be some sort of steering committe to handle policy
and moderation (** enforcement is the prime headache and the
key to future success and growth **), with Sarah handling the
technical & Web 20 aspects?

Are you folks still out there and committed??

I'm willing to assist moving forward by doing some of the ground
work myself. I can execute one of two options: (1) rename the list
and turn over the reigns, or (2) create the new list on Google
Groups (preferred option via the vote if I remember correctly),
migrate membership over, and turn over the reigns.

Sarah can then step in when she's available.

Q: To whom do I hand the reigns?


- Michael