Just let Stewart take some ownership. If he wants to be part of the problem, 
so be it.

Scott S

P. S. I didn't know it was still around either.




> You really think that was part of the problem?  They said readership and 
> sales were steady; ad revenue was way down.
>
>  Randy
>  --
>
> Stewart Mason writes:
>
>> I'm afraid part of the problem might have been that my first thought upon
>> reading this was "Wow, No Depression was still publishing?"
>
>
>