Jaimie wrote: >>And anyone suggesting Steve Vai or Satriani or any other wank artist is missing my point. It isn't about how many notes....it's about the right, tasteful ones.<< Wow. I find Vai (and Satraini, to a somewhat lesser extent) to be incredibly tasteful soloists, offering unique melodies (granted, sometimes played at blinding speed, but certainly not all the damned time) combined with delightfully baffling feats of technical prowess. They are likely not too concerned with “how many notes” they’re playing – being technically proficient means being able to express one’s self at a higher level, which, obviously, can mean MORE NOTES. Did J.S. Bach write “too many notes”? If you actually listen to a Vai album – hell, a single song – you’ll find lots of slower, emotional, intensely tasteful playing mixed in with the volcanic blasts of sheer musicality. Rock fusion isn’t everyone's cup of tea -- especially for one whose tastes reject everything that isn't immediately "hooky" -– but to dismiss it as “wankery” reveals a lack of understanding of the genre. It's fun and inspiring, as a musician, to see/hear the possibilities of your instrument laid out right in front of your face -– Vai and the other “wankers” provide the carrot some of us rabbits like to follow. After all, being a musician is about growth, isn’t it? But I get your point, J-man. Question: who is the best Canadian guitarist ever, in your opinion? I’m talking wankers here, not “tasteful” folks like that cat who used to play on Bryan Adams' albums (he was pretty killer, not too flowery, very tasteful and composed solos that fit the songs). kErrY www.myspace.com/kompost NP: Piano Reductions Volume I (Mike Keneally's piano renditions of Steve Vai songs; gorgeous! And proof that Vai's music is far more substantial than being a mere platform for his fretboard prowess) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs