But to be honest, very one-sided.

John L. Micek wrote:

>
>
> I only agree with that premise on the music side. In contrast, its 
> political coverage, particularly Matt Taibbi's, has been quite good.
>
> john micek
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <synthhtnys@comcast.net>
> To: "Holmes Online" <bholmes_fm@msn.com>; <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Blow Me, Rolling Stone
>
>
>> Yup. RS stopped being relevant decades ago.
>> It is to rock journalism what Danielle Steele is to literature.
>> Give me MOJO any day.
>>
>>
>> -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Holmes Online" 
>> <bholmes_fm@msn.com>
>>
>>> They're leaking the list of new nominees and who are they touting? 
>>> Madonna.
>>> Nice job, Jann Wiener. Many moons ago, I remember reading RS cover 
>>> to cover
>>> like a Bible the day it arrived. Now it wouldn't know "rock'n'roll" 
>>> if it
>>> bit them in the ass.
>>>
>>> I guess I shouldn't really care what these buffoons do, but it still 
>>> gets
>>> under my skin.
>>>
>>> b
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>