That's the best you can offer?

Um, wasn't this a discussion group?  And not the "Why you, 
I don't like what your saying! You better stop before I 
actually say something that matters".

And I mean that with all the affection you offered me.

Nothing but love Y'all ..

Jeez, who let the Roman Empire in ?

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:21:11 -0400
  "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: 
><tinyvolcano@wavecable.com>
>> Are we really going to place FOW and Supergrass 
>>-collectively or any 
>> other ways in the same class as the Beatles?  Or any 
>>other band for 
>> that matter?
> 
> Oh, fer chrissakes...
>>
>> C'mon, they are the friggin template for crying out 
>>loud. This list 
>> would not exist had the Beatles not contributed.
>> IMO.
> 
> Yes.  And when you have a template, you don't just leave 
>it in a display case to be admired, you make stuff with 
>it!
>>
>> OK, as far as main-stream pop goes for the 60's, you 
>>have Sgt,. 
>> Pepper & Pet Sounds as the two "God -like" albums to 
>>propel popular 
>> music. Sure, it can be said that many good things have 
>>come from 
>> many good and "influenced bands" that we all love to 
>>hear, but the 
>> simple fact is -these two records are the template, are 
>>the 
>> benchmark and they have not been rivaled since.
>> Who? Who has bettered these albums? Who?
> 
> Who cares?  Who is making this argument besides you? 
> Who?
> 
>> You can't, it's not possible-because THEY created the 
>>master formula 
>> by which all pop music WE here on the list listen to.
> 
> Well, then why don't we just listen to those two -- and 
>ONLY those two albums, then?
> 
> S
>