A. Haber wrote:
 
<<See, here we are again, back in that old comfortable-to-some shoe  of a
Rock-'em-Sock-'em Robots melee over some pointless argument that nobody  will
remember six minutes from now. You guys could chalk this all up to  differing
opinions, but what fun would that be?

This is why I don't  post here all that often. Why bother, when something I 
might
say that seems  totally innocuous to me might seem like a personal affront to
someone else?  Especially someone who is looking for a fight? In my world, you
state your  opinion, someone may disagree with it, you talk it out, you wind 
up
agreeing  with each other or you don't. In other words, you agree to disagree,
but you  agree to get along. It doesn't always work out like that, of course, 
 but
that's the goal.

I mean, we could keep the discussion to music we  like and be civil towards 
one
another. That would be a novel  approach.

As for Paula, I think she handled herself just fine. Some of  the rest of you,
well, not so much.

C'mon, y'all, don't worry...be  happy! There's a new Richard X. Heyman CD out
there, and it  rocks!>>
 
I have a question that's been on my mind during this scintillating  
back-and-forth:

Who's Richard X. Heyman?

John B.