Jeff, I'm with you on this one. When it's good it's great, but with so many of the songs clocking in at a minute and a bit, I can't help but feel they were half way to a good song and couldn't quite come up with the big finish, or chorus or whatever. Still, far better to have half a great album than the dross Red Hot Chilli Peppers managed to fill 2 discs with earlier this year. Mike. >From: "AssociationWorks" >Reply-To: audities@smoe.org >To: >Subject: Re: NSAIG...New Sloan >Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:29:04 -0800 > >While I agree most of Sloan's output is stellar...I'm a bit luke warm >to this record. A good half of it is great...but with 30 tracks it's hard >to find the cream from the filler. I kind of wish it was shorter. >Maybe I need to listen to it 20 more times. > >Speaking of year-end faves... >How bout The Fags?? "Light Em Up" is phenom, bombastic power pop of the >highest >order!! Awesome awesome awesome. The new Jet record is very good as well. >Anyone else disappointed w/ the new Lemonheads? After 10 years, I was >expecting >something much more impressive. > >Jeff > > > > Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:40:51 -0500 > > From: "Holmes Online" > > To: > > Subject: NSAIG > > Message-ID: > > > > New Sloan album is great! > > > > An "Abbey Road" segue-riffic slab of short songs that have me thinking >of > > several classic 60s AM and 70s power pop bands, XTC, Splitsville, >Spirit, T > > Rex and even that freakin' Edwyn Collins hit fergodsakes. Thirty - count > > 'em - thirty tracks and the majority of them are repeaters. > > > > Lucky Canadians have had this for a while. Lucky Americans will see it >in > > five weeks. Sloan is back *strong*. > > > > cheers > > b