In a message dated 6/8/2004 2:02:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, audities-owner@smoe.org writes: <> I would also like to add that I think a big difference is that most of what is being "referenced" by the majority of power-pop groups is fairly old--25 years at least, if not 40--and very rarely do you find a power-pop group that is primarily influenced by anything more modern. That may be a big difference, because if you compare power-pop to a different genre, like, say, rap, or any sort of electronic music, then you'll find groups who are influenced by/somewhat imitating groups that are either still around or were around not as long ago. This, I think, is the only real problem--if someone wants to sound like the Monkees or the Zombies or whatever then I think that's cool--but I think that the fact that the power pop universe cut itself off sometime in the late '70s means that a lot of the new stuff sounds a little too much like it's trying to recreate some type of golden age. I guess the stuff that I personally like best (and listen to the most) is cognizant of all those classics but sounds distinctly modern--someone like Bleu or Fountains of Wayne, for example, or people like Adam Marsland and Mike Viola who have a very distinct personality and could never be mistaken as imitators. I definitely don't think that the "referencing another group" thing is unique to power-pop, nor is it bad, it's just that because the references themselves are so old it sometimes creates the feeling that power-pop is a dead genre, no longer evolving on its own.--Jason