--- In audities@yahoogroups.com, garymaher@j... wrote: > 1. worst bands > 2. worst bands > 3. worst bands > 4. worst bands > 5. worst bands > 6. worst bands > 7. worst bands > 8. worst bands > 9. worst bands > 10. worst bands > > So you don't like them, and you can't be bothered to explain why. Are you > saying that others shouldn't bother to check them out, or that we should > realize the error of our ways and stop listening to them? > > Yawn. > > g, grouchy because, as always, "I myself don't like it" is being equated > with "It is objectively bad" > > NP: Vandalias - buzzbomb! > Hi Gary, Yes, I am suggesting that what you like sucks and you should not listen to it. While your at it, please stop listening to the Vandalias! Kidding!!! Personally, I gave my post and thought I was being clear that it was totally subjective and had as much to do with time in one's life, as the music. It honestly never occurs to me that my opinion would be regarded by anyone as fact. Seriously, that would be a big mistake to take my opinion as fact, I don't even do that! However, even Stewart's thinking Belle and Sebastian suck to the high heavens doesn't really matter to me, despite the fact that I respect his opinion on music. Why doesn't it matter, well, because I like Belle and Sebastian and I have to listen to them through my ears and experience (not Stewart's). That said, It was mostly for fun in my eyes but I know that these threads are found annoying by some and not fun. There is no real point beyond that and honestly some of the fun is seeing that some with great tastes on this list love what I do not. It all works. Anyway, honestly no harm meant to anyone who loves what I do not. For goodness sakes, I've said it before, LEO SAYER'S first two albums are great!! Therefore, why would anyone listen to my opinion? :) Lastly, I got grumpy over the MSNBC aspect of the thread the other day, so hey, I can relate to how your feeling, even if it's different things that bug us. So really, no harm meant. best, Steve