~~~~~~~yeah. this whole thing is weird. and sad. 
cause one of the first things i thought is...who would
let their 12 year old stay with michael jackson at
this point?

jocelyn
--- Mark Tate <zumpp99@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Do you think anyone can ever benefit from child
> molestation charges? Short 
> of murder, it is the most heinous crime I can think
> of. Most people also 
> believe this and are not as forgiving as they would
> be if the charges were 
> drug- or other violence-related. I seem to remember
> reading snippets over 
> the years that the '93 event has hurt him
> financially. I doubt it's a stunt. 
> But, then again, maybe you were being sarcastic.
> 
> My question is how can he be so stupid to even allow
> for the opportunity to 
> exist for such charges to be levied (whether valid
> or not). What an extreme 
> dumbass! And the parents of the kid involved are
> either just as stupid as 
> jacko or gold-digging opportunists. The latter is
> not a remote possibility 
> in my opinion. Even though I think he is the most
> fucked up public 
> character, well, GG Allin may have him on that,
> there is a high possibility 
> that it's extortion. And because he is so fucked up,
> there's a high 
> possibility that
> he did do it. And if he did do it, then the Parents
> of the kid are unfit and 
> possibly culpable as they should never have exposed
> their kid to the 
> possibility given the unresolved event of '93.
> 
> 
> >
> >This whole thing wreaks of a publicity stunt and
> the DA's office is in on 
> >it!  Everytime McJackson's popularity is waning, he
> seems to be brought up 
> >on molestation charges and BAM....back in the
> spotlight!
> >
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Is there a gadget-lover on your gift list?  MSN
> Shopping has lined up some 
> good bets!  http://shopping.msn.com
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/