In a message dated 10/4/03 4:00:43 PM, Mark Tate Wrote > > I was explaining my interpretation of the analogy since a question of the > meaning was floated about. I have no opinion of Wow one way or the other. > > > Oh i got that > > I was just using your explanation as a jumping off place > to um toast some Moby Grape Jams > > Who in some tupe of bizarre coincidence are name checked twice in the > letters section in the current issue of Rolling Stone. > > > and not in a good way > > Mb > >From: MogleyB@aol.com > >Reply-To: audities@smoe.org > >To: audities@smoe.org > >Subject: Are The Storks in a Grape Jam? > >Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:14:54 EDT > > > > > >In a message dated 10/3/03 10:01:18 AM, audities-owner@smoe.org writes: > > > > > > > The joke is that Moby Grape's first album was great, but their follow up > > > Wow > > > was horrible. That's my interpretation. > > > >HREF="http://tralfaz-archives.com/coverart/M/moby_grape_wow.html">Click > >Here: Check out "Cover Art: Moby Grape - Wow" > > >  Bitter Wind? > >Murder In My Heart For the Judge? > >The Place and The Time? > >Motorcycle Irene? > >HE? > >Naked If I Want to? > >  I grant you the Jam 2nd disc was pushing it. > > > >  But horrible is a strong word for a very cool record IMO > > > >Click > >Here: Check out "Cover Art: Moby Grape - Wow" > >http://tralfaz-archives.com/coverart/M/moby_grape_wow.html > > > >Ps the song" Seeing "on Moby Grape   '69 is excellent > >Mb > >Np The Peanut Butter Conspiracy. > > > >which of course goes great with my Grape Jam   bandwidth > > _________________________________________ >