>Bill Silvers, all over the map:
>>>What do those egalitarian,
>  >>broad-minded CoF folks think of them? Eb? Anybody?<g>
>
>If you really care, just skim the lists on the CoF page and see if 
>there are any Figgs votes. One thing which *definitely* makes the 
>CoF poll more valuable is that it publishes all the individual 
>lists. ;)
>
>OK, but don't the majority of individuals here post their best-ofs 
>to the list at large? And regardless of whether they do or not, 
>reading that X,Yor Z placed a band on their lists isn't as valuable 
>to me when removed from the context of my seeing X, Y and Z's 
>opinions on any number of other bands/topics in a list context over 
>a period of time. Your partly-responsive answer gets to part of my 
>trouble with your objections in general, based as they seem to be on 
>the assertion of the superior diversity of a hundred-odd lists from 
>folks who I don't know, outside of a list of their favorite records 
>in a pdf file. Does a CoF discussion list exist? What's CoF's 
>context?

You asked a simple question...I gave you a simple answer.