Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2009122, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Anna Borg <anna@tallboyrecords.com>
Subject Fw: Re: Pop Underground
Date Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:01:35 -0800 (PST)

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


True! powerpopnews.com is up and running, although still in
its infancy.

I like the bulletin board model because topics can be set
in specific categories.  So if I'm in the mood to find
out about new releases, it's right there, under a
header.  
 
It's all in one place and easy to navigate.

Since it's just getting set up, the initial users can have
a lot to do with the direction it takes.  It's a great
opportunity to make a destination site.

IMHO!
 
 Anna
wrote:
> 
> > From: rghwales@writeme.com
> <rghwales@writeme.com>
> > Subject: Re: Pop Underground
> > To: audities@smoe.org
> > Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 11:59 AM
> > 
> > From my experience there are really three
> models/styles of
> > sites to think about:
> > 
> > 1) Blog -  The best blogs usually result from
> > tight(er) editorial control.  You can think of a
> good
> > blog as being like a cyber-Zine.  Something like
> "Pop
> > Sided" was great because they had a great voice. 
> The
> > downside to this model is you need to have REALLY
> dedicated
> > leadership, especially with something like power pop.
> > 
> > 2) Message Board - This is a more community driven
> model
> > with anyone posting content.  This can work, but we
> > have the recently Linus of Hollywood launched Power
> Pop News
> > out there which is also under-utilized.  If this is
> > what folks want to do, I say go make that one work. 
> > The beauty of them is once they get going they
> basically run
> > themselves.
> > 
> > 3) Hybrid Blog/Board - Sites like these split their
> > mission.  They generally have editorially controlled
> > content AND ways for people to comment, post links or
> write
> > their own stories.  I'm part of a site like this (a
> St.
> > Louis Blues hockey site called St. Louis Game Time )
> which
> > has writers providing regular content, and sections
> called
> > Fan Links and Fan Posts where everyone else can chime
> in.
> > 
> > All three models have strengths and weaknesses.
> > 
> > My two cents....
> > 
> > Rich Horton



Message Index for 2009122, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help