smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "floatingunder" <underthefloat@msn.com> |
| Subject | Upon further review |
| Date | Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:30:35 -0000 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (0.9 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
This is question to any of you who write reviews of music (in print, blog or elsewhere). You all must have written reviews of music that you loved at that moment in time and then later, after repeated listens came to believe it didn't really measure up as you thought it had. Perhaps it simply didn't age as well as you'd assumed. Or conversely, perhaps you reviewed something you panned at the time but after further exposure to the music (or simply the timing of hearing it again at another time in your life) you came to love it.
So my question is do any albums really jump out to you that you initially loved and came to dismiss or even loath? Or vice versa? Have you written updated reviews to "correct" your opinion? If your so inclined to share, I'm just find such things interesting...
Steve D.
NP: Lou Christie "Paint America Love"
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.