smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | rob@splitsville.com |
| Subject | Re: Physical Graffiti/Musical Apologists |
| Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:14:02 +0000 |
[Part 1 text/plain Windows-1252 (1.8 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
"regardless, the fact that both acts you mention got any attention AT ALL, EVER, pretty much proves my original point -- that physical appearance increasingly trumps legitimate talent"
That's actually a good point. A few months ago I was channel surfing and came across the P Dolls performing in Manchester, UK in the 15,000 seat arena that was packed. If they were a bunch of cows, they wouldn't have gotten through the local church talent show.
The music, btw, was diabolical.
I was more of an Appollonia 6 guy myself, as I'm a sex shooter.
------Original Message------
From: Kerry Kompost
Sender: audities-owner@smoe.org
To: audities@smoe.org
ReplyTo: kerry_kompost@yahoo.com
ReplyTo: audities@smoe.org
Subject: Re: Physical Graffiti/Musical Apologists
Sent: Feb 25, 2009 6:44 PM
Stewart Mason wrote:
>>If looks are all that matters, why did last year's Pussycat Dolls album flop so badly? Why weren't Vanity 6 Prince's highest-selling project?<<
I never said "looks are all that matters", bub; regardless, the fact that both acts you mention got any attention AT ALL, EVER, pretty much proves my original point -- that physical appearance increasingly trumps legitimate talent and I'll have nothing to do with it thankyouverymuch.
On another note, I've noticed -- over the past year or so -- an apologetic mindset forming here on Audities, people posting stuff like "Duffy's voice is kind of weak but it's not bad" or "the new Matthew Sweet songs are pretty OK, all thing considered", etc.
Wow. Does anyone have standards anymore, or is merely "ok" good enough when it comes to music these days? Does anybody remember laughter?
kErrY
www.myspace.com/nextprogband
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.