Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2009024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Craig Leve <snapcracklepopster@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Duffy
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:02:13 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (0.7 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window) 

Yes, yes, I completely agree on Candie Payne. Her album flags slightly
but the highs are so sensational. Tell me, Stewart, anyone - is she at
work on a follow up? Have I missed anything?

Thanks,

-craig


On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Stewart Mason <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
> I get what you're saying but it's just that you're standing athwart several
> generations of pop history with that argument.  A lot of folks thought the
> Beatles were kinda cute too, but their records were all right.
>
> I liked Duffy's album fine, but I still prefer Candie Payne when it comes to
> the new breed of UK retro-soul-chicks.
>
> S
>
Message Index for 2009024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help