smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | rob@splitsville.com |
Subject | =?US-ASCII?B?UkU6IFJlOiBTbGFnYXJpbmk=?= |
Date | Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:14:49 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain UTF-8 (3.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
>>no i don't, nor do i care, nor was lefsetz the person in >>question but i tried to name the wimpiest beer i could >>think of.
Mission accomplished. Worst beer I've ever had the displeasure to consume. And my beer standards are lower than whale shit.
>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: :audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org
>Sent: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:29:11
>
>I got your back. As they say in the movies, "time
>to take out the trash"
>
>Scott Homewood
>
>
>erhoek@comcast.net wrote:
>
>>"lighten up,Francis"...indeed.
>>Sobriety doesn't necessarily involve or not
>involve alcohol but you obviously commented on a
>response to another email that was posted by
>Elizabeth. Now if you are having a hard time
>grasping the content and who the original posters
>even were perhaps you should have someone aid you
>who can understand these newfangled contraptions
>and point you in the right direction so you don't
>continue to make an ass of yourself.
>>I believe everyone here has at one time or another
>mistakenly posted a comment on something someone
>else said but the difference here is that we all
>have been humble enough to admit their mistake and
>move on.
>>Not you ,Bob,you threaten bodily harm and stand by
>your asinine statement.
>>As for your threat to me...bring it on old man.
>>ryan
>>
>> -------------- Original message
>----------------------
>>From: bob <segarini@rogers.com>
>>> The post I commented on is included in my
>response.
>>> Â I missed nothing.
>>> Â My comment was aimed at the comment made that
>is included below.
>>> Â It looks pretty easy to understand if you ask
>me...scroll down and have a
>>> look.
>>> Â Regardless of who wrote the comment I
>responded to, it is THAT comment that I
>>> was responding to. Whoever 'b' is, THAT is to
>whom I am referring.
>>> Â I suggest you re-read the post, (quoted in
>it's entirety below), and then
>>> react accordingly.
>>> Â Â
>>> Â I remain...
>>> Â The Scarlet Claw
>>> Â ...and happy Canada Day to those of you that
>are so inclined...
>>> Â ...and accuse me of being drunk when I post
>again, erhoek...and I WILL get
>>> drunk and tear you a new one.
>>> Â
>>>
>>> erhoek@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Â Holy crap!
>>> You really need to read this stuff when you are
>sober before commenting,Bob.
>>> The story about the hipster wannabe had nothing
>to do with Lefsetz.
>>> Go back and read it again later and then
>apologize to the appropriate parties
>>> once you have a grasp of what was being said.
>>> -------------- Original message
>----------------------
>>> From: bob
>>> > You hope that someone peed in his Michelob
>Ultra?
>>> >
>>> > 1. You know what Lefsetz drinks?
>>> > 2. You hope that someone peed in it?
>>> > 3.You'll give 'bonus points' to someone that
>saw someone else do it?
>>> >
>>> > Don't take this the wrong way, but wow, are
>you ever a dickwad...
>>> >
>>> > segarini
>>> >
>>> > Holmes Online wrote:
>>> > > He spent the whole evening loudly dominating
>the conversation at his
>>> > > table with arcane Cheap Trick knowledge, and
>then this tidbit: "I was
>>> > > talking to Robin before, and I was all,
>dude, what was UP with that solo
>>> > > album?"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I hope someone peed in his Michelob Ultra.
>Bonus points for doing it while
>>> > he was looking.
>>> >
>>> > b
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.