smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Robert Berry <rberry@gandronics.com> |
| Subject | Re: naming update |
| Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:23:57 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (0.8 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
RCortIV@aol.com wrote:
> Just a quick chime in: isn't Pop Underground...oh I don't know...a bit
> generic? Audities was/is catchy, original, unique, unto itself. Pop Underground
> just kind of indentifies a genre.
I know I basically said this already, but this is why I like it. I think
the name should be straightforward and descriptive, not cute or clever.
(Especially since one person's "cute" is another person's "annoying." No
offense to anyone, but I don't think I could bear to see "Aural Sects"
in my inbox every day.)
I agree that "Audities" is catchy, original, and unique. It is also
completely opaque and cryptic. It says nothing about what the group is
about.
But no need to debate that here. Let's vote!
Robert Berry
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.