smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net> |
Subject | Re: Ringo says No, no song |
Date | Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:13:59 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.6 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Unfortunately, at this point in his career, I'm afraid I'm more
interested in Kelly Ripa's hinder than Ringo's music, and I have
almost no interest in Kelly Ripa. Former Beatle or not, this album is
just dull even by an-album-by-Ringo standards. It's not absolutely
awful like some of his solo records, but it's completely forgettable.
S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael vg" <govango@yahoo.com>
To: "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net>; <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Ringo says No, no song
> Either way you gotta love Dave Stewart's thoughts on it"
>
> "Four minutes (3 minutes and 40 seconds, actually) seemed like an
> appropriate amount of time for a
> former Beatle. Mr. Gelman apparently felt Ringo's musical legacy
> should take a back seat to
> additional banter about the size of Ms. (Kelly) Ripa's derriere," he
> said in a statement.
>
>
> michael
>
> --- Stewart Mason <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "M. Madler" <mrmadler@mc.net>
>>
>> >A legit complaint?
>> > or Ringo being unreasonable?
>>
>> It strikes me as more like "Ringo's PR people deciding that walking
>> off Regis and Kelly gets more press inches than Ringo appearing on
>> Regis and Kelly."
>>
>> S
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.