Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From rob@splitsville.com
Subject =?US-ASCII?B?UkU6IEdhYmUgYW5kIHRoZSBhaXJwb3J0IHJlbWFyaw==?=
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:06:04 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (2.8 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

And somewhere in Argentina Gabe is laughing, as he hoped for a certain reaction, and he got it...in spades. 
(Tell me I'm wrong, Gabe)


Gabe 1, Auditeers 0

>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: :audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org
>Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:34:34
>
>I was planning on just staying out of this whole
>discussion, since as a gay man, I probably could be
>percieved as being biased on what I think is or is
>not a homophobic remark.  I personally hate
>political correctness, and I have to admit that I
>chuckled *a little* when I read that Gabe's joke
>about the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport.  After
>thinking about it though, I guess I found the
>remark more stupid than offensive.  The idea that
>gay men (or closeted US senators looking for love
>in the wrong places) only listen to "wimpy" music
>that doesn't RAWK is laughable.  
>
>Don't get me wrong...I know many queens that will
>scream themselves silly over Celine/Barbara/Judy,
>etc.  It's just that this particular queen loves
>both the wimpy stuff AND the harder stuff.   And
>that has nothing to do with my sexual orientation.
>
>My 2 cents,
>Mark E.
>
>-------------- Original message -------------- 
>From: "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net> 
>
>> I'm with Bryan on this one. It's just
>disappointing to see blatant 
>> homophobia regularly get written off as "oh, that
>Gabe, wotta kidder." 
>> Now, maybe it's some big in-joke and Gabe himself
>is actually gayer 
>> than Rufus Wainwright singing Judy Garland, but
>even if that's the 
>> case, if you don't actually *know* Gabe, that
>doesn't come across. 
>> 
>> Gabe has every right to be as obnoxious as he
>wants, of course. But 
>> that also means that anybody who finds Gabe's
>needling offensive gets 
>> to speak up as well. 
>> 
>> S 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Bryan" 
>> To: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:00 AM 
>> Subject: Re: Suggestions for 2007 - Two top 20s 
>> 
>> 
>> > Yeah, I am just tired of people's schtick, I
>guess. Tired of the 
>> > specific 
>> > type of insult too, as it's really an immature
>way to be in this day 
>> > and 
>> > age, isn't it? Surely it's not something anyone
>approves of? 
>> > 
>> > And yeah, I've been on this list for 8 years? 7
>maybe? It's really 
>> > not the 
>> > same anymore, is it? 
>> > 
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > 
>> >> C'mon, Bryan, surely you've been on this list
>long enough to 
>> >> recognize 
>> >> Gabe's schtick when you see it... 
>> > 
>>
>===================================================
>====================
>Detailed Audities-List information:  
><http://audities.googlepages.com>
>To manage your Audities List settings or
>unsubscribe:
><www.smoe.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?func=lists-long-ful
>l&extra=audities>

Message Index for 2007123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help