smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Alexandre Siufy" <asiufy@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Experience with USB turntables ?? |
| Date | Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:47:20 -0200 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.1 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
It's all about tracking. A turntable that doesn't track well, coupled
with a cheap cartridge/stylus will slowly damage the sides of the
vinyl grooves. Of course, that might not be readily apparent, and
could effectively take years.
But the immediate effect of a proper audio turntable (not a DJ one),
one that tracks correctly, is the better audio reproduction.
I've also used many turntables over the years, most of them favoured
by DJs, including Technics, but now I'm much happier with a Rega.
alexandre.
On Nov 21, 2007 1:49 PM, Stewart Mason <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
> Please elaborate on the "bad for your records" part. I've been using
> a Numark for years with absolutely no ill effects.
>
> S
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexandre Siufy" <asiufy@gmail.com>
> To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Experience with USB turntables ??
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd go with the ProJect turntable. Stantons and Numarks are only
> > good
> > for DJs and bad for your records.
> >
> >
> > alexandre.
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.