smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Jaimie Vernon <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com> |
| Subject | With Or Without 'Em |
| Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:39:22 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.8 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Rob@splittsville wrote:
>Nah, I ain't buying it. Just because you've 're-written' them, doesn't make your
lines better.
>The chemistry is great, and it works.
Mullen drives it....Clayton just drags his sorry ass along.
>I still feel critics
look at Clayton like Ringo, the one chink in the armour that you can poke,
because the other >three are beyond reproach.
Says who? I've SEEN how Daniel Lanois created every sound The Edge plays. Remove that boy's foot pedal and he'd be lost.
>With or W/O You? Because
it's simple means it sucks, that it's not meaningful?
I'm not talking about the song. Dynamically it's moving and quite powerful. I'm talking about Clayton's bass line....which was spliced together by Lanois the way. How bad do you have to be when you can't hold those four notes steady through an entire tracking of a song?
>Shit, give me four guitar
lessons, and I can play a bunch of Beatle tracks.
Bet you can't.
>I'll be singing 'I Don't Want
to Spoil The Party' in about 30 minutes. But its simplicity doesn't mean it
isn't >fantastic.
Again...wasn't talking about the songs....was talking about the PARTS.
>You have been reading and contributing to the punk
string, correct? That's kind of what we're talking about.
How so? I'd put The Clash's ham-fisted slash'n'burn approach against U2's any day of the week. You're right...simplicity isn't the issue. But execution is.
Jaimie Vernon,
President, Bullseye Records
http://www.bullseyecanada.com
SWAG:
http://www.cafepress.com/bullseyecanada
BULLSEYE LIVE 365 RADIO:
http://www.live365.com/stations/bullseyerecords
Author, Canadian Pop Music Encyclopedia
http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Pop_Encyclopedia/
http://www.myspace.com/jaimievernonsmovingtargetz
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.