smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Michael vg <govango@yahoo.com> |
| Subject | Re: Stewart Mason's 25 overrated thingies |
| Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:48:38 -0800 (PST) |
[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (0.8 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
--- Aaron Milenski <amilenski@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone contradict me in a reasoned way, something beyond "but the
> songs are great?"
Here is a thought. Merriam Webster (as far as dictionaries are
concerned I feel is a little over-rated) defines that word
as " to place too high a value on".
Hmmmm, so if I think let's say Oasis stinks, can i really
say they are over-rated? Not really, because I do not place
a high value on them.
At the same time can i say that someone who thinks they are
the best is over-rating them? Not really because that person
places a high value on them not me.
Semantics? Maybe.
michael vg
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.