smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Marty Rudnick <mrudnick@marturo.com> |
Subject | Re: Blow Me, Rolling Stone |
Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:38:54 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.1 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
But to be honest, very one-sided.
John L. Micek wrote:
>
>
> I only agree with that premise on the music side. In contrast, its
> political coverage, particularly Matt Taibbi's, has been quite good.
>
> john micek
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <synthhtnys@comcast.net>
> To: "Holmes Online" <bholmes_fm@msn.com>; <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Blow Me, Rolling Stone
>
>
>> Yup. RS stopped being relevant decades ago.
>> It is to rock journalism what Danielle Steele is to literature.
>> Give me MOJO any day.
>>
>>
>> -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Holmes Online"
>> <bholmes_fm@msn.com>
>>
>>> They're leaking the list of new nominees and who are they touting?
>>> Madonna.
>>> Nice job, Jann Wiener. Many moons ago, I remember reading RS cover
>>> to cover
>>> like a Bible the day it arrived. Now it wouldn't know "rock'n'roll"
>>> if it
>>> bit them in the ass.
>>>
>>> I guess I shouldn't really care what these buffoons do, but it still
>>> gets
>>> under my skin.
>>>
>>> b
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.