smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Alan Haber" <zoogang@cox.net> |
| Subject | Re: The Beatles: and what if... |
| Date | Sat, 8 Sep 2007 18:33:51 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.7 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Or they might have become a fab Beatles cover band.
Alan
http://www.buhdge.com
http://www.purepopradio.com
-----Original Message-----
From: audities-owner@smoe.org [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf Of
Josh Chasin
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 4:20 PM
To: audities@smoe.org
Subject: Re: The Beatles: and what if...
I think they would have fallen out of popularity by '72, but their 1980 Nile
Rogers-produced disco comeback lp would have gone platinum.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Paulino Neto" <rpaulino@bignet.com.br>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 8:49 AM
Subject: The Beatles: and what if...
> What could have happened if the Beatles went on through the 70s and 80s?
>
> I know it may be unfair and unrealistic to exercise this type of fantasy,
> but I often ask this to my Beatles fans friends. Of course, many of the
> facts in rock music after the Beatles, happened because of them (and/or
> because of their demise, one might say), but I always like to hear
> opinions.
>
> Would they go the 'commercial' way? or what about prog rock? AOR? fusion?
> AM pop, soft rock? electronic music? how would they face punk rock?
>
> Would they get into rockier sounds, with jams, heavy guitars, long solos?
>
> Maybe politically correct and incorporating more and more third world,
> ethnical influences?
>
> Or would they turn into something like the Rolling Stones, with the
> occasional sell-out tour and non-important records?
>
> And finally, would they be able to keep their quality, still having
> commercial success and still being important to rock, and pop culture as a
> whole?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Rafael.
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.