Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Bruce Brodeen <popmusic@notlame.com>
Subject Office again - unGoogleable
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:17:40 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Amen, Stewart.

I tell bands this all the time......all the time.

It's CRUCIAL for them to REALLY think about the name of a band - and the
title of their album. They both need to be optimizable( new word!) for
search engines, always.

It's blows me away how supposedly well-managed large indie acts, let alone
major label ones so this all too often against their better good judgement.

If a generic band name, well, the album title *has to be* a unique sounding
phrase that will connect w/ the band name.

Another band we have on the Not Lame site, is this great classic old school
power pop band made up of a bunch of kids who are a Beatle cover tribute
band(called Backbeat) and the non-Beatle band is named:  Story.

And the album is self-titled.
'nuf sed. 

Bruce
@ Not Lame




> From: <audities-owner@smoe.org>
> Reply-To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:00:16 -0400
> To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Subject: audities-digest V5 #526 (13 msgs)
> 
> 
> As I said in my AMG bio on them a few months back, these guys are just
> about the most unGoogleable band this side of The The.
> 
> S 
> 



Message Index for 2007084, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help