smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | fjeder@shiner22.net |
| Subject | Re: Why Kiss and Not Dolls? |
| Date | Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:23:05 +0200 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I guess it was the liveshow pyrotechnics and all. KISS looked like
stars from the word go.
I'm from Denmark and my first record was actually "In too much too
soon", but it was KISS all over my walls.
Fjeder
www.shiner22.net
Citat af G FUENTES <gfuentes1375@msn.com>:
> Hey all, here is a question that I was contemplating while watching
> Gene Simmons' Family Jewels on tv today with my friend Charlie (he is
> Korean). Anyway, I liked Kiss (still do) although I was never a fan of
> Gene Simmons as a person. His show is actually decent and he comes
> across as a lot more likeable than I ever imagined. Well, watching the
> show, my Korean friend Charlie asked me.."Why did Kiss become famous
> and the NY Dolls didn't become famous?..It wasn't that Kiss was more
> talented than the Dolls"
>
> So I thought it about for a while and I have to admit that my Asian
> friend is correct. It was not talent that made Kiss more successful
> than the Dolls. Not that the Dolls were necessarily more talented than
> the Dolls but I don't think it was talent alone that made one better
> than the other. Was it luck? focus? more professional attitude? less
> drugs?
>
> Help out me and my friend Charlie- this Korean guy I know
>
> gabriel
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.