smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | synthhtnys@comcast.net |
| Subject | Re: Why Kiss and Not Dolls? |
| Date | Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:58:44 +0000 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Well... I guess this is a lesson in men being able to dress up like superheroes being more palatable to the masses than men dessing up as ugly women. (Oh, hang on I forgot about Twisted Sister.)
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "G FUENTES" <gfuentes1375@msn.com>
> Hey all, here is a question that I was contemplating while watching Gene
> Simmons' Family Jewels on tv today with my friend Charlie (he is Korean).
> Anyway, I liked Kiss (still do) although I was never a fan of Gene Simmons
> as a person. His show is actually decent and he comes across as a lot more
> likeable than I ever imagined. Well, watching the show, my Korean friend
> Charlie asked me.."Why did Kiss become famous and the NY Dolls didn't become
> famous?..It wasn't that Kiss was more talented than the Dolls"
>
> So I thought it about for a while and I have to admit that my Asian friend
> is correct. It was not talent that made Kiss more successful than the Dolls.
> Not that the Dolls were necessarily more talented than the Dolls but I don't
> think it was talent alone that made one better than the other. Was it luck?
> focus? more professional attitude? less drugs?
>
> Help out me and my friend Charlie- this Korean guy I know
>
> gabriel
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.