smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Marty Rudnick <mrudnick@marturo.com> |
| Subject | Re: Poor Little Avril |
| Date | Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:29:40 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I find it interesting that there is now a new version of Girlfriend with
rapper Lil Mama, in which the chorus in question is essentially
reapeated over and over again, interlaced with rapping. It almost
entirely discards the verses and establishes the chorus as the main
focus of the song. It is...as they say...the hook.
Naturally, the chorus is usually the cornerstone of any song, but in
this case it's almost the entire song. Which bodes well for The Rubinoos.
Avril's people argue that the alleged similarity of the song is "five
words". In this case, it might as well be "We will we will rock you".
Ok, that's six words...
Marty
Mike Vancha wrote:
>on 7/13/07 1:35 PM, Lee Elliott at blelliott01@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0d2z-dWZmE
>>
>>
>
>What is the legal definition of plagiarism? Is it not two bars of a matching
>vocal melody with the same number of bars of a matching lyric?
>
>The words and the rhythm of the vocals are the exact same for a bar of music
>(1 and 2 and 3 e an uh 4 and) but the melody is completely different. Is
>this enough to constitute plagiarism, whether intentionally done or not?
>
>Mike V.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.