Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007064, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Mike Vancha <mvancha@sasktel.net>
Subject Re: McCartney/Wilson
Date Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:11:41 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (3.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Hi everyone,

I think part of the problem is that high standard which are holding
McCartney to. We want him to come up with something classic that will be
really great and I don't know if that's fair.

Having said that, why are most of the older rock and pop musicians not able
to make the best music of their lives the way a lot of the great classical
music composers were able to? You would think one would only improve over
time and get better with age. Is the fame and money too much of a
distraction?

I just read the other day that Paul McCartney turned 65 years old on June 18
and Brian Wilson turned 65 on June 20. I didn't know those two were born two
days apart!

Mike V.




on 6/21/07 5:47 PM, Richard Brown at rbrown1985@yahoo.com wrote:

> Dammit, I hit send before I was finished...what I
> meant was if they were painters, then Macca would have
> brought color to John's brilliant charcoal
> pictures...I think paul was better at serving up a
> fully realized album...and I really love it when he
> does the one man band thing.
> 
> Of course it is hard to match up a 10 year solo career
> vs a 37 year solo career.
> 
> That said...I still like "Chaos" much better than
> "Memory", but there are tracks I dig on the new one,
> especially "Only Mama Knows" and "Dance Tonight" (I
> like the ad too).
> 
> Rich B
> 
> --- Richard Brown <rbrown1985@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Richard Brown <rbrown1985@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: audities-digest V5 #418 (13 msgs)
>> To: audities@smoe.org
>> 
>> Had to chime in and agree with this comment.
>> Lennon's
>> solo albums, post "Imagine" are incredibly weak.
>> 
>> Paul lived, so has now moved from the cute Beatle to
>> the disappointing Beatle now. Might lennon have
>> gotten
>> better? I say 'no'. Lennon and Mccartney needed each
>> other, but I think Lennon needed Macca more. Macca
>> brought the color to John's brilliant
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:59:37 +0100
>>> From: "Mark Smith" <markmsmith@gmail.com>
>>> To: audities@smoe.org
>>> Subject: Re: Paul McCartney
>>> Message-ID:
>>> 
>> 
> <e7e4bef40706210859p182166b2qf74a946587dedfad@mail.gmail.com>
>>> 
>>> I would posit that Lennon did many more
>> embarassing
>>> and shameful things than
>>> dance around in an iPod advert.
>>> 
>>> I've got  no problem with the advert. Indeed Dance
>>> Tonight is maybe the
>>> weakest track on a pretty good album and hearing
>> it
>>> cut down to 30 seconds
>>> is probably the best way to hear it.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> ______
>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>> Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos'
>> Green Center.
>> http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> ______
> Get your own web address.
> Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL


Message Index for 2007064, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help