smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Benjamin Lukoff <blukoff@alvord.com> |
Subject | Re: Paul McCartney |
Date | Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:01:57 -0700 (PDT) |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
"Gratitude" is a bit gravelly.
Oh, and doesn't he sound like Glenn Tilbrook on "House of Wax"? (Of
course, I know who came first.)
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Alan Haber wrote:
> Ya know, I was going to say exactly what the legendary John B. has now said,
> but I thought, why state the obvious? Shoulda followed my instincts. If
> anything, Paulie sounds more vibrant than he has in many a moon. I love this
> totally gravel-free record.
>
> Alan
> http://www.purepopradio.com
> http://www.buhdge.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: audities-owner@smoe.org [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf Of
> Popdude@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 2:27 AM
> To: audities@smoe.org
> Subject: Re: Paul McCartney
>
> J. Shelton wrote:
>
> <<OK...I sampled his new album at iTunes. The only song I could stomach
> was
> the one semi-rocker that had a real Wings flair to it. The others sounded
> like a gravel-voiced old man trying to recapture the
> songwriting magic he possessed about 30 years ago.>>
>
> "Gravel-voiced old man?" What the hell? This album may not be everyone's
> cuppa tea (I really like about half of it), but to say McCartney sounds
> even
> remotely "gravel-voiced" on it is just plain ridiculous.
>
> John B.
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.