Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007061, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Mark Smith" <markmsmith@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Macca
Date Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:39:20 +0100

[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (2.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

When I said it seemed wrong, I didn't really mean wrong in the sense that
artists shouldn't be signed to a coffee shop's record label, more that for
me personally going into a coffee shop to buy a record in amongst people
queueing for their latte's seemed an *odd* thing to have to do - it felt
wrong. I couldn't care less who McCartney is signed with, it makes no
difference to me as a consumer of his records. The only time it matters to
me is when I can't actually get a hold of his record in a record store as
seems to be the case with this new one.

Who an artist is signed to and where I buy their record are two separate
things and whilst I don't pay much attention to whether I'm buying from an
indie signed artist or an artist on a major, I would prefer to buy my CD's
from an actual record shop. Also, let's be honest it'll make no difference
to Starbucks survival if I buy it there but it may make a difference to my
local independent record shop.

Mark

On 6/7/07, Jaimie Vernon <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Why does it matter WHO released the CD or why? The fact is that somebody
> DID. We're in a world where it took 4 years for Tears For Fears to get a
> label to actually put their last CD in retail stores and where every new
> "event" album gets sold with exclusive packaging, bonus tracks and other
> incentives just so you'll go to *their* store and not someone else's.
>
> I recall in the '80s buying Rhino-styled hits collections from Shell gas
> stations. I have TIME/LIFE CDs I bought off of television. I have LPs I
> got
> by sending in pop bottle liners along with $2.99 for postage from 7UP.
> None
> of these companies are in the music business.
>
> I don't see the problem with Starbucks selling CDs. They're no more
> interested in the music they're pimping than the CD retailers at this
> point
> because many of the CD retailers are now selling T-shirts and ballcaps and
> Family Guy dolls so it won't be long until their stock-in-trade, like
> Wal-mart, is ubiquitous just to stay alive. CDs or shoes or coffee, it's
> all
> just inventory.
>
> And at the end of the day all you want is a CD, right? Go buy it from
> Starbucks. And don't buy their coffee.
>
> Jaimie Vernon,
> Bullseye
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Hotmail with drag and drop, you can easily move and organize
> your mail in one simple step. Get it today!
> www.newhotmail.ca?icid=WLHMENCA153
>
>

Message Index for 2007061, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help