Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007061, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Benjamin Lukoff <blukoff@alvord.com>
Subject Re: Macca on eMusic
Date Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:21:27 -0700 (PDT)

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Aaron Milenski wrote:

> >It's faint praise indeed to call this his best work since at least FLOWERS
> >IN THE DIRT, if not TUG OF WAR,
>
> I am not commenting on Stewart's taste here (since it was his post), but
> merely asking:  is there some sort of  consensus that FLOWERS IN THE DIRT
> and TUG OF WAR are better than CHAOS AND CREATION?  I thought it
> was miles better than those two albums (I always found them the two most
> overrated albums in his ouvre, but that's not really a knock on CHAOS,
> which I realy like a whole lot), and got the impression at time of release
> that most critics felt the same way about CHAOS.

I think that is the general consensus. I have hardly listened to CHAOS
myself since its release. Now, FLOWERS and TUG have their own problems--I
still think half of FLOWERS plus half of OFF THE GROUND would have made a
great album, just as half of TUG plus half of PIPES OF PEACE would
probably have been a good idea--but I could never get into CHAOS. Whereas
I've been listening to the new one for a couple of weeks now and haven't
quite gotten tired of it yet.


Message Index for 2007061, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help