smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Scotthomewood@cs.com |
| Subject | Re: Macca on eMusic |
| Date | Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:56:22 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I'll emerge to say that whenever friends are talking about great Paul McCartney albums, Flowers In The Dirt is talked about as the best McCartney album since Band ZOn The Run. In the past two years, Chaos and Creation has never come up, though I do like it. It ranks far below Flowers In The Dirt, which ranks in his solo top two, as far as I am concerned.
Scott Homewood
"Aaron Milenski" <amilenski@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>It's faint praise indeed to call this his best work since at least FLOWERS
>>IN THE DIRT, if not TUG OF WAR,
>
>I am not commenting on Stewart's taste here (since it was his post), but
>merely asking: is there some sort of consensus that FLOWERS IN THE DIRT
>and TUG OF WAR are better than CHAOS AND CREATION? I thought it
>was miles better than those two albums (I always found them the two most
>overrated albums in his ouvre, but that's not really a knock on CHAOS,
>which I realy like a whole lot), and got the impression at time of release
>that most critics felt the same way about CHAOS.
>
>Aaron
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!
>http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.