Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007053, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From AdamGhost@aol.com
Subject Re: IKE and financing new recordings
Date Sun, 20 May 2007 21:38:21 EDT

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (2.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

On the IKE thing, I have some sympathy because when YOU DON'T KNOW ME came 
out we had a deluxe package CD which came with an extra CD and a DVD and we sold 
it for $50.   I realize that's a whole different scenario but the reason I 
bring it up is that, frankly, we knew that with the amount of people that we 
could be relatively sure were going to buy the album, having a premium CD package 
was the only way we were going to get enough cash back to do any kind of 
promotion on the album.   That's frankly why this upcoming compilation is the only 
one of my albums so far to be priced under $10; I would have loved to drop 
the price but I knew that I wouldn't get enough extra people through the door to 
make up the difference in the money coming in.   I think with myspace and the 
Wilson album times have changed now, we'll find out soon enough.

Point being:   again, if we're talking about new music models, musicians are 
all now mini-entrepreneurs and they each know their individual situations 
better than we do.   Me, I've got a back catalog, so I can put out a low cost 
compilation that will hopefully build towards a new album.   Someone else might 
have their own studio, or have a larger than usual reliable fan base, or what 
have you.

I think particularly if we've all agreed that the rules have gone out the 
window, musical product has been overvalued, etc., that it's lame to then 
criticize a band for adapting to the new situation in any way they can.   I band 
shouldn't HAVE to go into the hole to make an album unless they choose to.   If 
they find another way to do it, I don't think it's anyone's business.   I 
wouldn't do it that way personally because I don't think I'd be giving the fans 
enough for their $50, but when I was touring full time I've done all kinds of 
other crap to keep going -- right down to throwing raffles.   If IKE has enough 
people to make it work, and doesn't alienate too many people in the process, God 
bless 'em.

Again, a new musical paradigm should not mean that all avenues that musicians 
can possibly make a buck are foreclosed, musicians should never expect 
(although may sometimes get) a paycheck, and they should be happy to just make art.  
 I don't get the stigmatization of people who work hard and spend a lot of 
time at something, upon offering it to people, wanting to get a little scratch 
back in return.   I just don't think that's for someone who's not in that 
position to dictate.  


**************************************
 See what's free at 
http://www.aol.com.

Message Index for 2007053, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help