smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Marty Rudnick <mrudnick@marturo.com> |
Subject | Re: for Stewart and the subscribers to eMusic |
Date | Wed, 09 May 2007 23:06:13 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.6 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
In retrospect, you're probably right....I did do a bit of exploring,
based on Audities recommendations, I also picked up the latest Pernice
Brothers album, plus tracks from Decemberists, New Pornographers, and a
few others. I guess I was comparing it to the iTunes music store.
There's no denying their catalog is much deeper, and the relatively
seamless integration into iTunes/iPod-land is...easy.
And if it's music that I'm dead serious about, I'll still buy the CD
from Not Lame or Kool Kat.
But your points are well taken. And for what it's worth, I too am also
frequently puzzled by things I do.
Marty
Stewart Mason wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Rudnick" <mrudnick@marturo.com>
>
>> Not a fair comparison....your taste in music is surely broader and
>> more current than mine. I went looking for specific tracks by my
>> favorite artists, mostly of decades gone by, and usually found
>> nothing, or sometimes a lame re-recording. The lame re-records are
>> also on iTunes....I've learned my lesson about impulse purchasing.
>>
>> No doubt there is a lot of great music I passed over, because I
>> didn't know who they were...
>
>
> I guess I'm just puzzled that you didn't use it as an opportunity to
> explore: some of my favorite albums of the last five years have been
> things I've taken a flier on through eMusic, with no prior knowledge
> of the artists. I actually think that's the service's most important
> function.
>
> But yeah, NEVER download an oldie. You'll be disappointed almost
> every time.
>
> S
>
>
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.