Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007052, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: too much and or not enough
Date Sat, 12 May 2007 12:18:23 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain (4.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

So, do you buy your milk directly from the farmer who complains that he 
can't make a profit either?

Mike Bennett



Blog: http://blog.myspace.com/mrhonorama
Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
Find out about Chicago shows: 
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/





>From: "Jeff" <jeff.teez@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: "Audities" <audities@smoe.org>, <bobhutton@btinternet.com>
>Subject: Re: too much and or not enough
>Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:37:36 -0400
>
>I'm just fantasizing here that I represent the typical consumer of
>music:
>
>We, the consumers, will determine the value of your musical product
>because we ARE the marketplace. You can accept that reality or not,
>obviously. Your fortunes (literally or figuratively) or lack thereof
>will no doubt follow your decision. Collectively, we'll decide with our
>ears and then our dollars what your music is worth. We may decide that
>it's worth $2.00 a track, or we may decide that it's worth .09 cents a
>track (the current going rate on the lowest priced Russian mp3 sites).
>We may even decide that it's not worth anything at all and choose to
>ignore you entirely. The labor, love or sweat that you put into it
>doesn't factor into the equation at all from a strictly consumerist
>point of view. You could've tossed something brilliant off in your
>basement in 15 minutes and posted it to your myspace page and it's so
>damn good that suddenly everyone is clamoring for it and will pay
>accordingly. Or, you could have labored for hundreds of hours in an
>expensive studio and come up with a piece of crap that *nobody* is even
>remotely interested in. Ultimately, it's OUR decision, not yours or
>anyone associated with you. You put it out there however you're able and
>however you see fit. We can handle it from there. We don't need to or
>want to pay your publicists, lawyers or anyone else. We'll gladly pay
>YOU for the music you make. If I decide that I want to take your music
>home with me (in a physical or digital sense), then I'll most happily
>put my $15.00 of hard-earned cash in your hand after seeing you play
>LIVE. I'll put it in YOUR hand and very much enjoy seeing you tuck it
>into YOUR pocket. If you want to split it up amongst your business
>associates or whomever else after that, that's up to you. But don't
>expect or ask ME to pay them. And that's exactly what I'm doing by
>paying iTunes, EMI or anyone else.
>
>I'm not personally responsible to any of you in the music business
>anymore than any of you are personally responsible to me. You can try to
>*make this* personal all you want, but it's basically bread on the table
>v. music on the victrola. Put the product out or don't, but don't blame
>your problems on us. We're just fans and, ultimately, consumers. We're
>not here to help you pay your phone bill just because you're *trying
>really, really hard*.
>
>Aren't you just pissing into the wind when you complain that some/most
>people want to pay as little as possible or even nothing for your music?
>No kidding. Isn't that, in part at least, and for only SOME of us, human
>nature? What in the world can you possibly do about it? What do you
>propose? I'd suggest that you accept that reality and either keep making
>music within the current parameters or don't. But for God's sake, please
>stop whining about it.
>
>I'd sure be interested in hearing what the 650 OTHER auditeers who don't
>regularly (or ever) post here think about all this. We pretty much know
>what the other 36 of you think. You've stated it, refined it, restated
>it, clarified it and on and on, ad nauseum. Even the Big Star thread is
>a step in the right direction away from all this woe-is-us fatalism, and
>God knows we've not discussed their merits (or lack thereof) nearly
>enough on this list.
>
>jeff teez (crouched and head covered in the elementary school hall of my
>imagination)
>

_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows 
Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507


Message Index for 2007052, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help