smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | <tinyvolcano@wavecable.com> |
| Subject | Re: All Things Must Pass (or else they'll create intestinal |
| Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:11:44 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.7 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
That's the best you can offer?
Um, wasn't this a discussion group? And not the "Why you,
I don't like what your saying! You better stop before I
actually say something that matters".
And I mean that with all the affection you offered me.
Nothing but love Y'all ..
Jeez, who let the Roman Empire in ?
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:21:11 -0400
"Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From:
><tinyvolcano@wavecable.com>
>> Are we really going to place FOW and Supergrass
>>-collectively or any
>> other ways in the same class as the Beatles? Or any
>>other band for
>> that matter?
>
> Oh, fer chrissakes...
>>
>> C'mon, they are the friggin template for crying out
>>loud. This list
>> would not exist had the Beatles not contributed.
>> IMO.
>
> Yes. And when you have a template, you don't just leave
>it in a display case to be admired, you make stuff with
>it!
>>
>> OK, as far as main-stream pop goes for the 60's, you
>>have Sgt,.
>> Pepper & Pet Sounds as the two "God -like" albums to
>>propel popular
>> music. Sure, it can be said that many good things have
>>come from
>> many good and "influenced bands" that we all love to
>>hear, but the
>> simple fact is -these two records are the template, are
>>the
>> benchmark and they have not been rivaled since.
>> Who? Who has bettered these albums? Who?
>
> Who cares? Who is making this argument besides you?
> Who?
>
>> You can't, it's not possible-because THEY created the
>>master formula
>> by which all pop music WE here on the list listen to.
>
> Well, then why don't we just listen to those two -- and
>ONLY those two albums, then?
>
> S
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.