Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: What IS influence, anyway?
Date Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:55:13 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain (2.4 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Two points --

1.  Sometimes an artist is directly influenced in a manner that is readily 
apparent from the music.  But sometimes the influence comes more in the 
motivation to create - Elvis and The Sex Pistols are good examples of this.

2.  When writing reviews, I'm trying to become more judicious in using the 
phrase "influenced by", because sometimes you learn that the artist your 
writing about has never heard of the artist you are claiming influenced him.

Mike Bennett



Blog: http://blog.myspace.com/mrhonorama
Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
Find out about Chicago shows: 
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/





>From: Sam Smith <sam@lullabypit.com>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org
>Subject: What IS influence, anyway?
>Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:20 -0700
>
>  All of this talk about Elvis and the Beatles brings me back around to
>the question of what exactly influence IS. I always thought I knew, being
>a writer with a boatload of influences myself. But maybe I was wrong.
>
>We always loved hearing Mitch Easter talk about what a big influence Led
>Zeppelin was, because you listen to Let's Active and you really don't
>hear it. At least nobody I know does. I have another buddy - Mike Smith
>of Fiction 8 - and he talks about The Church like Sister Mary Margaret
>talks about Jesus, but hit their MySpace page and tell me how much Marty
>Willson-Piper YOU hear. Skinny Puppy? Sure. Joy Division? Yup - in
>spades. But Church?
>
>The truth is that all musicians seem to have all these other musicians
>whose work they love, but whose influence you'd never be able to detect
>from listening, no matter how good your ears are.
>
>So I guess I wonder - there being a good number of musicians here, and
>plenty more informed listeners - is there a standard that says if I can't
>hear it, it's not really an influence? Or can influences be more or less
>invisible to the listener of the finished product?
>
>And let's try to keep Conway Twitty out of this one, mmkay?  :)
>
>
>_______________________
>
>Sam Smith
>
>[TABLE NOT SHOWN]
>
> 

_________________________________________________________________
With tax season right around the corner, make sure to follow these few 
simple tips. 
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?icid=HMFebtagline


Message Index for 2007024, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help