smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Popdude@aol.com |
| Subject | Re: PAK |
| Date | Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:05:07 EST |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
A. Haber wrote:
<<See, here we are again, back in that old comfortable-to-some shoe of a
Rock-'em-Sock-'em Robots melee over some pointless argument that nobody will
remember six minutes from now. You guys could chalk this all up to differing
opinions, but what fun would that be?
This is why I don't post here all that often. Why bother, when something I
might
say that seems totally innocuous to me might seem like a personal affront to
someone else? Especially someone who is looking for a fight? In my world, you
state your opinion, someone may disagree with it, you talk it out, you wind
up
agreeing with each other or you don't. In other words, you agree to disagree,
but you agree to get along. It doesn't always work out like that, of course,
but
that's the goal.
I mean, we could keep the discussion to music we like and be civil towards
one
another. That would be a novel approach.
As for Paula, I think she handled herself just fine. Some of the rest of you,
well, not so much.
C'mon, y'all, don't worry...be happy! There's a new Richard X. Heyman CD out
there, and it rocks!>>
I have a question that's been on my mind during this scintillating
back-and-forth:
Who's Richard X. Heyman?
John B.
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.