smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Amplifierj@aol.com |
| Subject | Re: audities-digest V5 #49 (7 msgs) |
| Date | Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:38:45 EST |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
In a message dated 1/23/2007 12:05:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
audities-owner@smoe.org writes:
Joe --
Based on this e-mail, I'd still much rather read Amplifier than Alternative
Press or Blender. I can see where you're coming from, but I can also see
where Brad was coming from -- in the past couple years, whenever I picked up
a copy of Amplifier, it's obvious that the focus has broadened, which,
depending on one's point of view, may or may not be a good thing.
You also demonstrate that there are artists featured without ads in the
magazine. And I think a lot of people would agree that having an e-mail
exchange made public to the world is somewhat unfair. However, that's why
people have to be extra careful with e-mail (and as Mark Foley now knows,
IMs too). Could you, if you are willing, clarify your side of the story
regarding the e-mail exchange?
Mike Bennett
Thanks for the offer Mike but my new credo is to be "extra careful" with
e-mail, phone calls, and personal conversations unless they take place outside
in a noisy environment. Anything you would like to know about Amplifier is
all right there in the pages. If it's too bland, too commercial or you just
plain don't like it, that's cool with me. If you enjoy it, thanks for the
support.
Peace,
Joe Joyce
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.