Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Jayson Jarmon" <jaysonj@luxworldwide.com>
Subject Re: top ten p pop artists of past 15 years
Date Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:41:41 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (3.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Touché, Matt! Touché!


-----Original Message-----
From: audities-owner@smoe.org [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf Of
Matt Whitby
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:12 PM
To: audities@smoe.org
Subject: Re: top ten p pop artists of past 15 years

I thought 'pop' was just short for 'popular' which would mean it can't be
constrained by any partiular genre?

I'd agree that on the whole it's just too subjective.  That said - i'm right
- you're wrong.

Glad we cleared that up.



On 04/01/07, Jayson Jarmon <jaysonj@luxworldwide.com> wrote:
>
> It's apparent to me that there is and has been some struggle to identify
> what "pop" is here at Audities (let alone "powerpop").  It seems to be one
> of those terms which very reasonable people can disagree about.  Like the
> idea of "art" it is sometimes easier to say what it isn't that what it is.
>
> We can say that Badfinger is pop -- I think there would be few detractors.
> But when you say Nirvana is pop, or the Sex Pistols were pop, you start
> getting into broader questions about inter-speciation, hybrids, and the
> idea
> that the *bands* themselves aren't pop bands, per se, but that the songs
> are
> pop.  I imagine we can acknowledge that Queen is a *rock* band, but "My
> Best
> Friend" is a pop song...
>
> So, I hope this doesn't start a firestorm or anything, but my view is that
> pop is a broad term, and that it's fairly porous. If you're into pop music
> and self-identify as such, that's pretty much good enough for me.
>
> You could of course go right to Platonic archetypes and argue about the
> defining characteristic of pop, but that hurts my head.
>
> I'm with whomever it was who said:  "Fuck art, let's dance!"
>
> --Jayson
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: audities-owner@smoe.org [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf
> Of
> Steven Alter
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:49 PM
> To: audities@smoe.org
> Subject: Re: top ten p pop artists of past 15 years
>
> If I can add Shoes (plus the two Greenberry Woods records to go with
> Splitsville), I'm taking your list... :-)
>
> Michael Bennett <mrhonorama@hotmail.com> wrote:  Some of the artists on
> Dave's original list don't fit my personal power pop
> criteria. These do:
>
> The Shazam
> Fountains Of Wayne
> The New Pornographers
> Splitsville
> Guided By Voices
> Michael Carpenter
> Andy Bopp (Love Nut/Myracle Brah)
> The Loud Family
> Matthew Sweet
> Tommy Keene
>
> If Frisbie had one more album, which they will eventually, then they'd be
> in. And I can't quite characterize The Sugarplastic as power pop, or
> they'd
> be up there too.
>
> Mike Bennett
>
>
>
> Blog: http://blog.myspace.com/mrhonorama
> Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
> Find out about Chicago shows:
> http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop.
> http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>



Message Index for 2007011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help